Leadership Journal

May 14, 2008

We're Listening

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services logo
Last month, former U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Emilio Gonzalez discussed an editorial printed in the New York Times about USCIS’ recent application backlog--and it generated more interest from readers than any other Leadership Journal entry to date, both in terms of the numbers of readers and posted comments.

I am not surprised. We all appreciate that immigration benefits granted by USCIS, including citizenship, employment authorization, and permanent residency for immigrants and their families, are incredibly important to you--our customers and stakeholders--and our nation. We also know that our business processes are not always transparent or easily understood—they are admittedly complex. In this Journal entry, I’ll try to address some of your comments.

Many comments dealt with the surge in applications that took place after USCIS announced its new fees. After a long, in-depth review of our financial situation, we increased our fees last summer. We had to. USCIS is almost completely funded by fees, and the agency was not meeting its obligations or operating costs under the old fee structure.

To meet those obligations, we needed to invest in new facilities and technology and build our staff to improve the service our customers deserve, knowing it would take some time to accomplish. These things do. We needed to ensure funds were actually coming in the door before hiring thousands of new employees or making investments in technology.

We expected an increase in filings prior to the fee increase, but not nearly the volume of filings we received. We did not foresee the impact of the national discussion on immigration reform, or gauge the impact of an overwhelmingly effective drive by community-based organizations to encourage immigrants to file for citizenship.

Now that the fee increase is generating needed revenue, we’re hiring and training 1,334 new adjudications officers and 521 new support staff – totaling 1,855 new USCIS employees, many of whom are already on board. We’ve shifted existing employees where that made sense, moved work where capacity was available. We are rehiring retired, experienced employees, and are developing new facilities to better serve customers. We’re even conducting interviews, where needed, on Saturdays, Sundays and after normal business hours.

At the same time, we’ve embarked on a joint plan with the FBI to eliminate the name check backlog. By providing additional funds to increase the FBI’s capacity to conduct name checks, we’ll eliminate the name check backlog by the end of next summer.

As a result of these combined efforts, we are now naturalizing new citizens at record levels. But just as important as what we are doing to address the surge in naturalization applications is what we are not doing: we are not compromising the quality or national security in processing these increased applications.

Again, thank you for reading and responding to USCIS’ previous Leadership Journal entry, and for reading this one. I look forward to reading your comments. This Journal is an excellent way to communicate with our stakeholders, and one that we intend to continue.

Jonathan “Jock” Scharfen
Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

___________________________
[Note from the moderator: There is a software constraint that limits the comments that can be viewed on the post to 200. To better view the newest comments click here. This is not a limit on the comments, which can be seen in their entirety. ]

Labels: ,

427 Comments:

  • Jonathan,

    Thank you for your post, I think the attention have been directed to the backlog and naturalizing new citizen, but have forgotten work visa people like me.

    My church have filed an R-1 visa extension for me 1 year ago, right now it is still in the "process" I can't drive in the country because the work visa expired, my Canadian have a hard time coming in because the border keeps grilling her about my pending visa status, even though I follow all the rules and regulations that the law requires me, my file is already the system , but USCIS failed me. I am a pastor, I don't earn enough, I can't drive to work, I am separated from my wife, I have a mortgage and own property here. What else can I do? I have waited for ONE YEAR and still nothing. Please don't forget about people like me, who follow your rules, who file everything you require, who are legal educated immigrants that spent the last 10 years receiving American Education, serving the Community.

    If you feel like responding to me directly, my email is stsang@tccm.org

    By Anonymous Sam Tsang, At May 15, 2008 9:16 AM  

  • I do not think an increase in fees, for a chance to a citizen of the best country on earth, is too much.

    The increase is small. The cost of everything has gone up. Realistically is a bargain! I do not think we should sell “U.S. citizenship” cheaply……it has cost us lives to maintain our quality of life here. Anyone who wants to come here should be willing to do what it takes……..and willing to do it absouletly legally or they can just stay where they are.

    No “ifs”; “ands” or “buts”.

    Thanks

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 1:07 PM  

  • Well, if you spend 8 years waiting for be resident and your family is waiting for you? then you will understand what your feel waiting for all this time. Anyway I have notice a great progress in the USCIS service, hope this continue, thank you!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 3:23 PM  

  • The change of fees is fine, but when you think of changing the fee you are also taking in consideration better services. How come now it is taking 10 months for an I-130 to be approved, where before it only took 4-6 months to receive approval? I am frustrated with our immigration changes. Please do something. You increase the fees but don't keep families apart, make sure all cases are processed within the time frame. CIS should have planned this...where are all the top level people. No one thought that more people will apply because of the increase of fees. I am okay to pay more but I expect better services!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 3:50 PM  

  • Um, I hear you talking Jock, but the fee increases took effect nearly a year ago, and there hasn't been much improvement in the way of processing or customer service, so I fear this is much ado about nothing, and that the service will continue to use the increased fees as what Bill Yates called a Ponzi scheme. Also, can you assure the public that hiring people on a GS-5, 7, and 9 scale will improve customer service, especially where individuals who by your own definition would not qualify for and H-1B "specialty occupation" (you'll take anyone with a bachelors degree in any field) will be in a position to decide who qualifies for such positions?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 4:09 PM  

  • You have a problem that increased fees will not solve. In the 1990s, your predecessor agency was given substantially increased resources. The result - massively increased backlogs.

    The problem with the CIS is that the internal culture is toxic. You have created a system where employees are punished for trying to excell, while mediocraty and even malfeasence is tolerated.

    There are so many things that your agency could do (and could have done) to increase productivity. You have wilfully ignored these opportunities. In my opinion, the only way to provide acceptable immigration services to America is to eliminate your agency and replace it with another. Prohibit anyone who has ever worked for the INS/CIS from working for the new agency. Make the employees and supervisors accountable for their work. Anything short of that will just perpetuate the sorry business as usual that we have now.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 4:29 PM  

  • If green card process takes so long that H1b visas expire ( 6 years) subsequent H1b filings extensions of I-129 and related I-539 should be free of charge. I don't understand why we have to continuosly pay for USCIS delays.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 4:38 PM  

  • I will love to know why does it take so long to process political asylum cases, say about five years for cases (especially people form west african countries, who were fighting war at the time of applications)?
    If there are no reasons for approval, I think they should be told, which allows them to find alternatives. The longer it takes to process, the more hope these applicants and their families have. Some of these applicants have been separated form their families for five or more years, but are still waiting for your decision on cases.
    Is there a specific reason for delays?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 4:48 PM  

  • You admit USCIS lacks transparency. Why don't you change that? There are a lot of easy quick fixes that would help the public understand better the progress USCIS is making towards processing applications.

    1) Publish accurate processing times, and publish them ON TIME. Right now they are often a month late, yet they state posted on the 15th of the previous month.

    2) Publish ACCURATE processing times. NSC processes some I-140 petitions 6 month ahead of their published times. Others are still pending a year after the published times.

    3) Give proper case status information over the phone. I want to know where my file is and what happens to it. NSC recently stopped giving case status updates for employment-based I-485s altogether. Its unacceptable that you stockpile files for years without touching them and applicants can't even inquire about the status of the case.

    4) Allow the public access to your case status database. For example, post the case number of every approval as soon its processed. That would allow to see in real time what cases with what receipt dates are being processed by what center. The information is already public and is completely unpersonal and does not reveal any private information. This would help understanding what the actual processing times are.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 4:54 PM  

  • I would like the director to address the issue of the rampant ICE raids and worksite raids and the ICE relationship with local law enforcement. These actions scare the hell out of most every immigrant or nonimmigrant.

    Are fees paying for the detention facilities, for the local police? Educate me on these issues please.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 4:58 PM  

  • I believe the online status system should serve as a reference of "what is going on" inside USCIS. It would provide much needed information & relief to the anxieties of many applicants who have patiently waited for their turn on line to get some feedback. After all, they too pay taxes.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 5:06 PM  

  • The first comment on this board said the fee increase was not much. While the increase may pose some hardship for some, that is not the impression I got for most if not all of the persons who posted a comment to the lst blog. As a matter of fact, I as well as many others, have no problem with the cost in dollars or time to attend interviews and fingerprints. I will gladly double my payment if it will have any effect.
    The problem is, and continues to be that the service (measured in processing times) does not correlate with fee increases. In other words show us what you are doing with the money.
    If the backlog for for applicantion INCLUDING THOSE STUCK IN THE FBI NAME CHECK are eliminated, I gurantee there will be no one having anything to complain about.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 5:16 PM  

  • I will like to use this opportunity to welcome the Acting Director. We hope you will bring fresh ideas and follow through with promises made to the public and to congress.
    In regards to the comment Mr. Gonzalez made to the New York Times article, I will like to inform Mr. Gonzalez and employees of the USCIS that the article criticized him and other decision makers of the agency not the employees who are working really hard under archaic immigration laws and in an agency with redundant and efficient procedures

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 5:21 PM  

  • I appreciate the effort and the enormous responsibility of your task. The raise in the fees is totally justified. However, none of the improvements you describe affects the issue of the background checks. I couldn't agree with you more that those checks are needed and that, without them fully completed, nobody should be granted citizenship. However, people wait years for those checks. In my case, how come that I am waiting almost three years for a background check? Even if it is a manual process, it is too much time. I hear that it is the FBI's fault and not yours, so how can your agency help and collaborate with the FBI so that they can have more resources to do the checks faster? I believe that the number of "mandamus" law suits would diminish a lot if that was the case.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 5:21 PM  

  • I appreciate your service to the country. At the same time it would be great if you can make sure EB1 applications are adjudicated according to their merit. Speaking to different lawyers and reading from different forums, it gives me an impression that EB1-EAA adjudication is really dependent on someone's luck.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 5:23 PM  

  • Dear Anonymous,

    You might want to get a better education before you leave comments of this sort. If the government would let good people here to support their American Citizen wives and children rather than separating perfectly good families, there would not be any complaints!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 5:51 PM  

  • What steps are being taken by USCIS to reduce the backlog of EB3 I-140 especially at NSC. There is tremendous amount of disparity between service centers. Many of them are stuck at this stage because of the snail pace not able to invoke AC21 to switch job. Many of them have returned to their native countries abandoning incredible long journey.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 6:04 PM  

  • The first poster is obviously clueless. The rise in fees was not a small increase. It was nearly a 400% increase. Also this view that citizenship shouldn't come cheap is very narrow and short sighted. The problems with USCIS go well beyond just citizenship.

    US citizens like me who want to be with their wives or there children are also caught up in this mess and the government is keeping us a part.

    I'm not against the fee increase but when a process that was supposed to take 3-4 months takes 7 months and counting is practically a crime.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 6:06 PM  

  • Welcome aboard Mr. Scharfen..I filed my N400 back in November 2006 and it's still pending as of now. They tell me it's due to FBI Name Check, and I tell them BS! Simply because it does not make any sense from a national security point of view to put someone's file on a shelf and let that person wonder around freely in the country. If the USCIS really cares about this country, they'd be making this Name Check backlog No 1 priority and not push it under the rug. I have been living in this great country for over 12 years and never had any problem with the Law or anything else for that matter, yet they just realized that they needed to check my name against the FBI database. You should have done that when I came in to the US or even when I became a permanent resident years back. The sad part about the whole thing is that I don’t see a light at the end of tunnel. Every time I call the USCIS to inquire about my case, they tell me we don’t know when your case will be processed and that it could take years. However, one great thing about this country is the judicial system, so Mr. Scharfen please get ready for yet another law suit.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 6:07 PM  

  • Despite the fee getting higher every year, what has been achieved?

    1. On the one hand, people who are here legally, pay all tax, contribute to economy, wait as long as 8 years to get their quota for green card (read: not even citizen). On the other hand, 240000 visa have been wasted becaused of USCIS's low efficiency. You may think 245000 is just a number, but it's the lives of 245000 people, who are working, paying tax, raising kids, just like you. Whose lives are often ruined by the low efficiency of USCIS. Try to put a suffering face on each and every one of those 245000, I hope you can still sleep at night.

    2. I-140 processing is getting slower and slower, and despite the fee increase, the premium processing is canceled. When one who's desparately waiting for the approval of the I-140 gets laid off from work, all the years of waiting and payment (often more than $10k for employment based case) are down the drain.

    3. Extremely slow I-485 processing. People wait 3,4,5 years to wait for their dates to be current, only to be told the USCIS won't process your case, and have watch the date retrogress again

    4. Incompetent immigration officers play with people's life, career, and family by not following the law. Too many cases to say.

    The USCIS is a horrible agency, and it handles people who can't vote. If US is heaven, the USCIS is the hell corner of this heaven.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 6:11 PM  

  • That's great! I believe now all you need is to grant green cards to immigrants who have filed and are now waiting to receive theirs. It takes them to receive them. Those who pay taxes should receive them faster too, in my opinion.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 6:45 PM  

  • Sorry,but you do not have any idea what is going on.citizenship fee is just the lest one from many others fees.Before you become citizen,you paying for green card,work permit and all kind of fees fingerprints ,doctors etc.All together is a lot of money.Or do you think is better if is citizenship for sale like automobil or house????????? thinks about that.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 6:59 PM  

  • I agree with the director that investments should be made. Regarding the very smart “anonymous” comments above – too bad you Americans do not know your history. Shame! Who sold you the citizenship back in the 17th and 18th century? Immigrants built this great country and the US citizenship is not easy to EARN, and is impossible to buy. The price I had to pay for the US citizenship is far greater than just the $600 I paid. So, dear American patriots, please, keep your mouth shot if you did not go to school and do not know the history of your country.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 7:21 PM  

  • I am certainly ok with the increase of fees, but its sad that what you pay for is not what you get. I have filed for my kids and its been actually 9 months and all have gotten is a receipt.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 7:32 PM  

  • I hope USCIS will reinstate premium processing for I-140 with multi-tiered fees and guarantees of service structure, so that people in dire circumstances can get the i-140 adjudicated promptly.

    By Blogger shiva, At May 15, 2008 8:00 PM  

  • I hope USCIS will reinstate premium processing for I-140 with multi-tiered fees and guarantees of service structure, so that people in dire circumstances can get the i-140 adjudicated promptly.

    By Blogger shiva, At May 15, 2008 8:02 PM  

  • hi
    yo did increase the fees for all immigration applications
    I did petition for my wife and my daughter( application I130 )but my case still pending
    Iam legal in this country I did not Understand why it's take so long to bring the familly and to leave together ; my daughter turn her third year so what can I do ?where she go to school?
    I was thinking that when you increase the fees for immigration application you will clean all the applications ;but still late nothing change
    application I130 (petion) the date did note change since 2006
    I mean the processing time still (january 2005) the date is not changing almost 2 years now ;and I do not know if the immigration at Vermont Service Center is different than the California Service Center
    I hope you will take in consideration and take care of the application ((( I130 ))

    thank you

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 8:29 PM  

  • Dear Sir,
    The promise to eliminate a name check backlog soon is encouraging!
    I hope that USCIS will be able to hold to this promise. As for myself, I am already waiting for more than a year for my name check to be completed. Naturalization case.
    Sincerely.
    Patient

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 9:00 PM  

  • Lots of last July's applicants are still waiting for processing of their I140s anxiously. It would be greatly appreciated if some methods could be taken to speen it up.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 9:33 PM  

  • Dear Jonathan,

    What is your take on the 3 year degree AAO appeal cases. Waiting to hear and the frustation is only left for us. Please be advised we are only stuck with the blessings of employers and USCIS. We need your courtesy very much. We have been staying here legally for 7 years, paying taxes and now we are no where. neither in our home country or country of opportunity.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 11:08 PM  

  • Thank you Jonathan:

    We really appreciate your kind words and your understanding of how important immigration is for us and our families.

    I am sure USICS knows how hard it is to wait for 6, 7, 8... years waiting for immigration (green card) to complete , while life is at complete halt with no progress in terms of career growth. And then another 5 years of wait for citizenship.

    If any USCIS officer will look back 5-10 years of their life they will see that they have come a long way, but the immigration applicants are still there waiting for the magic to happen.

    While waiting some families grow with new born kids who are US citizens and few members that are non-citizen dependent applicants. At that time its even more important for whole family to stay together.

    There have been some cases, where during the long wait times primary applicants have died (either naturally or accidentally) and his/her non-citizen dependent applicants had to leave the country.

    We really need a director like you, Jonathan, who understand our feelings, and is ready to speed things up. Thank you again.

    God Bless America.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 11:11 PM  

  • Please, can you speed up EB3 140 at NSC. They are 14-15 months behind.

    Thanks.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 11:15 PM  

  • As a US citizen born in this country I am appalled at the waiting involved to bring my wife and stepdaughter to the US. What is the problem in processing a simple case? When we got married we believed from what others told us that had married in the past that the process would take 3 to 5 months at most. We have been waiting almost six months and nothing has happened. It is a tragedy to fall in love with someone from another country. The USCIS doesn't care about the fundamental needs of the lives of others, it just plods on with the politics of Washington without remembering who it is supposed to be working for.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 15, 2008 11:28 PM  

  • I have been a married resident of the United states for six years and I have been married for five .My husband is a citizen of another country and I am saddened that the system doesn't allow my spouse to come to the United States.I love this country but if there is to be some change it should start with dealing with the problem of family separation.We can pay all the increasing fees there is...it is the laws that must change.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 12:14 AM  

  • I live in the United states as a resident for 6 years and have been married for five.It is sad that even though the fees go up the laws do not change. As a resident we work and pay taxes just as other United states citizens and we obey the laws...my question is why aren't we offered the same privileges .I have been apart from my husband for so long and the petition I filed has been pending.( it seems forever)..We can pay fees and still see no results until these laws change. Our children are growing up in separating homes because of immigration.At least allow a visiting visa for spouses of residents we don't ask for much.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 12:24 AM  

  • i am wondering if ya won't do anything about Hrifa's age out.we have a dream. please do something cuz we wanna go to school.ya forget about us

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 1:12 AM  

  • Is it working

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 1:41 AM  

  • This interim Assistant Director is a joke, USCIS is joke, Homeland Security is a joke. When are you guys going to get real? You get a double FF in a grading scale A-F.
    Just a lot of the same old rhetoric, what a joke!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 1:46 AM  

  • i have been suffering for almost 2 years now, i cant even file an application because of something called retrogression, i thought there is shortage of nursing in the united states , then how come an RN(registered nurse) can't his employer file I-140 or I-485 for him or even start work.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 2:28 AM  

  • Yes, your business processes are so complex that even your own employees do not seem capable of understanding, communicating or following them. There are many cases in the New York district office of naturalization applicants who applied in the winter of 2008 being interviewed and naturalized long before people who applied in July and August of 2007. I'm sure those that are still stuck waiting for an interview will be comforted to know that the system is working perfectly, the process is just too "complex" for them to understand.

    All of these new staff and overtime! All the state of the art upgrades at your district offices, flat screen TV monitors in Santa Ana, even! All this, and yet you still cannot process a ten page naturalization application in less than one year. From the almost one year that I have been waiting, I can tell that your agency is not only incompetent, but incredibly arrogant. You publish numbers and timelines that make no sense, even to your own staff, and your entire customer service strategy seems to be predicated on a "don't bother calling us, because we don't know what's going on, either" mentality. Whenever, heaven forbid, a politician or editorial writer points out your utter incompetence, your standard response is to hide behind the "National Security" response, just as you have done today, despite the fact that the vast majority of naturalization applicants are already residing in the United States. Your logic makes no sense, your arguments for "doing everything we can" is not credible and, in short, your organization is one big, unaccountable mess.

    Keep it up Jock-O, you're doing a heck of a job!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 3:02 AM  

  • Hi, We put in a I-130 form 2 years ago. Our case is at the California centre and the date (April 2001) has not changed in 2 years! Why is there not a premium processing service for this I-130 form? I would definately pay a higher fee. We would still like to be young when we immigrate and at this rate it looks bleak. Please do something about this ASAP as it is a great concern.
    Thank you

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 3:34 AM  

  • Dear Sir,
    Thank you very much for your letter. It shows you are open to any comments from USCIS customers, which can only be applauded.
    I would like to draw your attention to a possible problem with K-3 visa applications at VSC. It appears that, ever since January 2008, very few I-129F approvals for K-3 visas are coming out of VSC, while CSC is still approving them (often along with the I-130).
    This would mean that applying for a K-3 visa is no longer possible for every US citizen living in the East of the country (since these applications go to Vermont), while it is still possible for people living in the West of the country.
    Could you please explain this different treatment of identical applications?
    Also it seems that VSC has been approving I-129F petitions for K-1 visas in the past months. Some people have seen extremely fast approvals (within one month even). I do not understand why the fiancé visa applications are going so fast in Vermont, while spouse visa applications( K-3) do not seem to be moving at all.

    I truly hope these observations are wrong (since we are currently in K-3 visa process in Vermont), but it does not appear to be so.

    I thank you kindly to look into this issue and wish you all the best in the coming years.

    Kind regards.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 3:51 AM  

  • I have applied for the Citizenship 4 years ago. I am still waiting for the name/background check (that's what I was told by the local USCIS office). However, I sent a request to the FBI and I received a response from them that my name/background check has been finalized 3 years ago and the results have been sent to the USCIS office in Washington.
    It is not clear to me what is really going on.
    I am a tax payer and I follow the rules and I don't understand why I am being treat this way...
    This is an appalling way for the government to treat its citizens. These are people who followed the rules and believed what they were told by those in authority.
    I hope my case gets resolved soon.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 5:28 AM  

  • I've been living in the US for 12 years. Still not a citizen. I finished high school, college and am working overseas in support of my country and military, risking my life, paying my dues...

    Personally I don't think Gonzalez is the right person for the job. I believe he can't believe he's gotten to this level and thus doing more to appease his bosses than to focus on problems at hand.

    I foresee another few years before I am a citizen. YET my friend and his entire family who came as refugees and have been living on welfare 3 years after I came are all citizens.

    I know USC..bla bla may not consider me a citizen, but I feel I'm a better citizen and asset to this country than Mr. Gonzalez and his incompetent coworkers could ever be.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 5:50 AM  

  • Congratulations on your new job, Mr. Scharfen. And I am sorry I am suing you just as you are starting your new job. But, what else I can do really!!

    I applied N400 June 2005. I waited two and half years to get my FBI name check done. It has now been seven months since then, and my application is still awaiting final approval by a supervisor.

    I visited your website to check my case. But, everytime I input my case number, it returned that I input a wrong case number.

    I called your 1-800 number. But, the representative there said all she can do is to put inquiry about my case, which will lead to a letter saying my case is pending due to further investigation. And, I am only allowed to call the 1-800 numnber every 60-90 days.

    I visited the local office through your Infopass every month. I got a different story every time. The last time, the immigration officer there said they will take however much time they want.

    I even asked for help from my Congressman's office. But, the case worker said all she can do is to put an inquiry for me. Each inquiry took more than two weeks to be answered, and always came back with the answer that my case is under investiation. (Why couldn't this investigation have been done while my name check was pending?)

    So, I really have nothing else left to do, except to file a lawsuit.

    And now, at 3am, I still cannot sleep because of worrying about my case.

    If you really understand our feelings, and want to solve the issues, please, act on it!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 6:14 AM  

  • In Aug 2000 my wife and I got married in the uk where i come from it took one month to get my wife entry visa.I do not understand why now that it is going to take 10 months for my e130 to get approved.My wife is a US citizen ans she moved back to the US in 2006.I was not able to go at that time becasue i had to look after my mother.In july 2007 i lost my mother so then i was able to then thinking about moving to the US to be with my wife.I have only seen her twice in the last two years becasue of working and and not able to get the time off to go to the US.When we sent my e130 we thought it would not be to long before i got approved.The thinking behined that was how long it took to get my wife to the UK.How wrong we are. 10 months is like a life time for me and my wife waitng for the USCIS to look at my case.I hope they some how they do get quiker at sorting the e130 out and take a look at how the Uk got it so right in our case of doing it in one month.

    By Anonymous paul, At May 16, 2008 7:01 AM  

  • How can you explaing the pain somebody experienced by being separated with a wife living outside US? a marriage already consumed. I filed I-130 for my wife since then I have heard anything. I have been separated with my wife for about 2 years now. This is very troubling in someone life. Imagine two years no contact between couple married. YOu need help everybody as new director to get done. This is most powerful country on the face of earth but people suffer for sample family union.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 7:15 AM  

  • USCIS 1800 Customer service is going worse day by day.
    They are teating the customers as slaves. Very rude talking over phone. I'm afraid to call USCIS customer service. Don't know whom to contact / complaint.
    It could be due to large amount of calls but that is how they are getting their job. I'm not blaming all of the customer service representatives. some of them are really very Courtesies and giving enough details.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 8:14 AM  

  • When the fees are increased we expect fast processing. You should also consider opening the premium processing of I-140 & I-485. We would also like that there should be no discrimination based on the country of origin for EB1, EB2, EB3 etc. Currently these catogories are based on India, China, Mexico etc. Why is there such a discrimination.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 8:24 AM  

  • The fee increase doesn't seem to have improved processing times in comparable terms. Also, processing time estimates are not accurate. Phone inquiries about case status should be improved. As things stand now, customer service representatives just repeat what is available online when asked about case status, which applicants can check on their own. Customer service representatives should be able to give more specific information.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 8:38 AM  

  • its a big joke, i have been waiting for n400 for 1year to be processed and nothing. i130 for spouse nothing. i just want to get a driver's license.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 8:48 AM  

  • My experience as Employment based Greencard applicant:

    1. Labor petition took more than five years to process because of backlogs.

    2. I-140 took six months. No complaints here.

    3. I-485 took one year. I had to knock on many doors to let USCIS pick up my petition which was current all through this time and yet gathering dust in some warehouse.

    4. I spent loads of money renewing VISAs, work permits, reentry permits. To top these all, I spent money on drivers licenses every year. Add the spouse to the list and you see the financial impact.

    You guys (DOL/USCIS/DOS) should go back to school and learn the meaning of firt-in-first-out and then implement.

    Please stop trying to explain away the problems on increased applications. We want some action, not words.

    By Anonymous Immigrationvoice, At May 16, 2008 9:41 AM  

  • I do agree for the increase in prices, however, as being born in the USA and paying taxes since I was 18 years of age should have the privelege to bring my wife here should be faster not to wait 10 months to a year. I understand the people working in USCIS are working hard but understand when you have a loved one waiting for you such as my wife, it hurts tremendously. Put yourself on my shoes and imagine not having your loved one with you especially you wife. It hurts I been waiting now for 6 months and I have not received anything yet. It hurts please understand me. Thank You for listening.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 9:41 AM  

  • The increase in fees was ridiculous. Please explain how it costs CIS $355 to produce a work permit card, which is not much more complex than a driver's license that runs about $20. It is certainly not more complex than a passport, which costs $60 (and a refugee travel document – essentially a passport with fewer pages – costs CIS $385 to produce?!?). Some waivers, which are literally a 1-page form, cost $545 and take months to adjudicate. Why are FBI checks costing $80 through CIS, when an individual can apply directly to the FBI for $18 and get the results within a month?

    And, as other posters have indicated, most of the problems are service related. Why for example is the San Antonio office still not issuing residency cards for applicants who have been waiting for years on the "FBI name check" even though your own CIS memo instructs issuance of the card for anyone waiting over 6 months? Why is it now taking a year to get a relative petition for an asylee or to get a travel document?

    The explanations for both the increase in fees and the lack of service do not ring true.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 9:44 AM  

  • The fee increase is something that I don’t mind because it does hold some type of hope for better service. However, the service centers are not held accountable for the lack of production, Vermont specifically. California can be seen moving at an incredible rate of speed with I-130 and I-129F while Vermont is no where near the processing times that California has. USCIS website states that the processing times for Vermont and California are similar but if you take a look at Immigration tracking websites you will see a huge difference. While it has been acknowledged by the former ombudsman that service centers processing "backlog" tend to go for the easier cases to give the appearance of eliminating the backlog their is no real reduction. 10 months for I-130 petition for relative, fiancé , or orphan of a united states citizen and the related I-129f K3 visa petition seems a bit long when compared to the 3-4 months before the fee increase took place. So even though the fees were increased to provide better service and more resources for USCIS and its customers all that can be seen is added stress and frustration for those hoping to be with the family member(s) tat they petitioned for.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 9:58 AM  

  • I have applied for status adjustment three years ago and it is still far from finish line. I sometimes get confused because USCIS office seems unorganized and not sure of even what to ask from applicants.Please do sometihing to fix things and get rolling.

    Thanks

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:04 AM  

  • As the new Director, I think the first major step you need to do is to make the processing times updated. That will make a lot of people happy.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:16 AM  

  • as far as i am concerned, keeping families apart is inhuman and can even be qualified as criminal.
    how come a normal visitor gets a visa issued the same day and no background check is required for them, they enter the US without verification???when a spouse and children of a LPR and US Citizen have to wait? how would you answer that if you were invited to show how human your agency is?
    Please wake up and do something about this.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:33 AM  

  • USCIS is an extremely flawed organization. It has no standard rules, regulations, priorities. I applied for I-130 petition with Vermont service center which based on their current processing time frame is going to take an addition 6-8 months on top of the 3 months it has already been. It is ridiculous that you can process H1 application but not application for spouse of US citizen. I am fine with the increased fees if it leads to a better organization but it hasn't. How can you ever justify allowing workers to get into US before spouses of your citizens but this is exactly what USCIS is doing.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:36 AM  

  • May be its time to Out-source this just like all our IT & Call Centers to some Third world country for faster response. Maybe let say India or the Philippines ;o)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:47 AM  

  • The thing I hate most is all the finger pointing, my case has been stuck with the FBI name check for over a year and no one is doing anything. UCSIC always just say it's in FBI's court so they won't do anything. FBI won't answer to any of my question since it's requested by USCIS.

    I just filed a lawsuit since that's the only way to deal with this. As I understand, over 5000 lawsuits have been filed so far for similar issues this year. So, how dare any one say that USCIS is doing all it can? They are not, otherwise, there won't be so many angry "customers".

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:47 AM  

  • Hello,
    Mr. Paul on this column posted a comment about the UK immigration system. I am very familiar with the UK system and I have to tell you that they are far faster and more efficient than the US system.
    So it might be good to take a ook at how they do it. Quality improvement demands that you do it.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 10:48 AM  

  • Thanks to Jock for accepting the USCIS policies are admittedly complex to understand even to its own officers. Number of times addressing the immigration issues and trying to fix them do not solve the issues in apprciable manner. I think the rulers and beurocrats should come to un understaning on one line. rulers bark on immigration and beurocrats cannot support barking becos the policies are admittedly complex. Either USA should stop hiring employees outside country or have a rule to leave the country after working for 3 years. If a person works for more than 3 years then define the eligibility for immigration and more years so on. A person applying for green card is like a lighting candle in open air. Hope USCIS gains trust from the applicants.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:07 AM  

  • I am wondering on what exactly the fees and increased fees are being spent?
    The local USCIS office where I go frequently to inquire about my N-400 (Naturalization)case--has a nice flat screen TV and the sound on the TV is so loud that I can not hear what the immigraion office is saying to me. I asked her politely to speak up and repeat what she has said and she replied to me that she does not repeat things twice. The same immigration officer apparantly took her good time to enter the number of my case into the computer--she was entering one number at a time with just one finger. And finally I got the same old answer I was getting for the last 5 years-my case is pending the name check. So, it means that I reside in the US and I might be a threat to the country and my name is being checked for the last 5 years? Something wrong is here....

    So, I am wondering again--what are the fees are being spend on? Training of immigration officers? USCIS Being efficient? USCIS Immigration officers Being polite?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:09 AM  

  • I think most people arent really concerned about increased fees, but alot are concerned not knowning anything about their case once its in hands of service centers. I work with goverment as well, I work in Medicare program, but I've never encountered problems like I have with immigration system. Lets take I-130 for a example a wife visa, why is excisting family member treated like a 2nd rate citizen? Why do fiance visa get accepted 8 months faster? Or how come People filing at same time are never approved in similar timeline. I've seen I-130 filers get aproved withing 15 days without expedite, and filers waiting for 2 years just to have I-130 approved. Too add on top of that if you cant see your loved one while I-130 is being aproved you cant bring her here on visitors visa because it automatically gets rejected. It makes very clear that American "VALUES" are not the same in immigration. "FAMILY" does not come first. Ever since the start of my case everything has been a horrible experience. USCIS customer care is absolutely useless, the time frame is unjustified and with system that only frustrates everyone. Out of millions of filers, only handful are happy. USCIS forces people to use illeagal ways to bring their family over, because of how broken the system is. It punishes law abiding citizens and lets others get away with breaking the law. It has been a disgrace going through immigration, I hope you understand that this is in need of fixing families shouldnt suffer like this. Something has to be DONE!

    By Anonymous Ilya R., At May 16, 2008 11:16 AM  

  • Mr Director,

    Please find out what the adjudications officer are doing in Vermont. They have been processing I130 application for Jul for three months now. I am beginning to think that family separtation issue is low on your priorities. This really should be above all other applications including naturalization. It is ridiculous that you will take 9-10 months to approve a I130 for a spouse of a United State Citizen. Try staying away from your spouse for 1+ year.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:17 AM  

  • Few people benefit from Fee increases and delays apart from UCSIS, lawyers and employers. I have been in US for 10 yrs this year and have a masters degree from US. I don't have green card yet and I don't see it in the vicinity of 3 yrs. Can anyone stay in the same job/position for 7 yrs? If you aren't interested in our applications why don't you say so.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:21 AM  

  • It took me 8 years to become a US residence or Green Card Holder “like they says”, I field for I-131 travel documents, after one year of waiting and searching about what happened to my application, then the surprise came with denial letter… why because they didn’t received my pictures ha ha very funny, anyway I did send the pictures but to whom you are able to explain, no one, their word against yours.
    The fee was $170.00 when I applied but now it’s $385.00, the time was about 3-6 month to get you travels document and now 10-16 month. And he called that improvement in his department.
    The more outrageous part in the story is: you can Appeal for the denial but you’ve to pay a fee of $585.00, let me understand your way in thinking, if I want to apply for a brand new application it will cost me $385.00 “New fee” why I’ve to pay $585.00 for appeal application??????
    You know sir, it’s take one day to cross from Canada to USA, and 5 hours from Mexico to USA and it’s cost $1.25 to dry your cloth in public laundry due to crossing the river…you get wet right?
    If you decide to go into the legal way it’ll cost you a lot of times and money but if you decide the illegal way… you tell me.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:31 AM  

  • It's so shocking to learn how U and T victims are subjected to long waiting prior to have their paper work done. VAWA seem not to care about the long awaits the victims have to endure, some without help form federal. I would like to see the director issue a kind of statement regarding the operation of VAWA. People are so much Tired of VAWA.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:31 AM  

  • What is it with VSC, all they process in K1 petitions, CSC is processing K3 and CR-1 for filers in April already.
    What happened to family first??
    We pay increase just like K1 but the families are haveing to wait and wait. USCIS needs to look at their processing techniques, and VSC needs to follow CSC leads in processing family petitions!!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:53 AM  

  • I have nothing against the fee increase. The excuse that we could not forsee the surge of application is not acceptable. Similar increases happened with previous fee increases. The extra increase happened really because of July 2007 visa bulletin. I am not sure how that happened - both the fee increase and Visa Bulletin 2007 at the same time. The retraction and reinstating again of the bulletin created a confussion that made people apply. Everybody was confussed and could not be sure what will happen in the future. I am sure that if you did factor in both the increase in fee and making all dates current (visa bulletin Jully 2007) the increase could have been accurately predicted.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:54 AM  

  • As was already stated in the previous comments, it's quite obvious that, as seekers of immigration benefits, we ARE NOT concerned with the fee increase. What we ARE concerned with are ludicrous processing times, lack of quality customer service, and the fact that getting clear answers from USCIS is equivalent to pulling teeth. I'm a summer 2007 naturalization applicant from New York, whose background check has been cleared (according to InfoPass appointments) and who has been placed in queue for interview several months ago. To my understanding, gained from USCIS Immigration Officers, the interview scheduling is based on FIFO (first in, first out) basis. How exactly does the USCIS explain the fact that New York City applicants who applied as late as March 2008 are receiving interview letters, while applicants from last summer are still languishing in the "queue"? Another question that begs for an answer are the recent retrogressions in the district office-based processing timeframes. As of February 15, 2008, New York City was processing N-400 applications with priority dates of July 20, 2007. On March 15, the timeframes retrogressed to June 30. On April 15, the timeframes retrogressed yet again to May 28. I guess it's safe to expect that by the end of the year the USCIS will be processing N-400s from 2006? Let's not forget the recently released "Projected Processing Timeframes". The USCIS is predicting that it will process New York City N-400s from summer 2007 in 10.1 months. My case is already 9 months old, and no interview has been scheduled as of yet.

    When will the USCIS stop lying and present applicants with clear and real facts? Again, it's not about the fee hikes. Most of us would gladly pay twice what we've paid, as long as we actually received the service that we've paid for.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 11:56 AM  

  • I have never worked so hard for anyone (other than my dad) as for INS and USCIS. We run to get things done, never have enough people and our management is the worst I have ever seen in my 62 years (of age). Please ask the Indians what is going on and not the chiefs!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 12:13 PM  

  • Mr. Director,
    I would like to bring your attention to the disconnect in how K-3 visas are being processed in CSC and VSC.
    As it stands right now the CSC has been approving I-130/I-129F forms in as little as 2 months, while VSC has not seen many approvals since January 2008.
    I would also like to ask how your agency can justify super-fast approvals for K-1 visas but super-slow approvals for K-3 visas. They are the same non-immigration visas, the recipient still has to do Adjustment of Status. Why are those who chose to hold a wedding outside the US being punished for their decision?

    Best regards and good luck in your new job.

    By Anonymous Andrei Ivanov, At May 16, 2008 12:16 PM  

  • Well, some wonderful news for west coast people...one of visajourney visitors got their K-3 approval in 16 days. Yes, it was at CSC.

    USCIS, please normalize your processing times. It appears at this time that VSC has put all K-3 paperwork on hold and is working fast to process K-1 only while CSC is..well, doing what they are supposed to do.

    How hard is it to take some files and send them to CSC for processing? You do use computers, right?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 12:26 PM  

  • Fee increase is okie, but there should be out of the box ideas to increase the efficiency of the system.

    Why don't you guys come up with the ideas that can shorten/eliminate the backlogs for Indians in Employment based categories (EB) instead of just waiting for a Bill to pass or a law to be change. You guys should come up with some good ideas so that the Senate/House/Congress should work on those lines, instead of just waiting for things to change and let the people suffer 7-8 years for the GREEN CARD.

    Senate/House/Congress don’t really understand what LEGAL Immigration is, when you talk abut Immigration, its illegal immigration for them. When you talk abut Legal Immigration they talk abut H1B, don’t u guys at USCIS feel the pain of wait of 7-8 yrs for green card.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 12:35 PM  

  • Triple the fees, but hire more people and work more efficiently.
    We are waiting for YEARS for AOS!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 16, 2008 12:36 PM  

  • Congratulations on your new job. I am an employment based applicant and have been here in US LEGALLY following all the rules, sincerely paying my taxes and also worked hard to secure two master's degrees. After all this, my applications have been pending with USCIS for last 5 years and still do not know when all of this will come to an end. If people who play by the rules are treated in such a mann