Processing Questions
I’ve been reading—absorbing the more than 400 comments you left from my last Journal entry. You’ve asked many questions—mostly about our processing times, wait times for visa approvals, and how we’re responding to the record number of applications we received last year.
But most of all, you want to know when USCIS will complete your case. Let me try to address some of your concerns.
After visiting local USCIS offices around the country and reviewing our current production statistics, I am confident USCIS will beat our projected 13- to 15-month processing estimate for completing naturalization applications filed after June 1, 2007—while we continue to improve processing times for other applications and petitions. Next month, we will provide you with a detailed report with updated processing times for all USCIS offices.
Our employees are hard at work every day, including evenings and weekends, processing files and interviewing applicants. The results of their efforts show tremendous productivity. I am optimistic that USCIS will exceed our goal of completing more than 1 million naturalization applications this fiscal year, which ends September 30, compared to last year’s 748,000 naturalization cases. And so far, applications received have been lower than normal this year. If that continues, we’ll bring processing times down further than we projected.
Many of you also asked about the processing times displayed at http://www.uscis.gov/, and why the dates sometimes go backward rather than forward. We estimate those dates based on a formula that calculates, among other things, the number of cases received within a defined period, how many cases we’ve completed during that time period, and how many cases remain in process that are [*] beyond our established processing time goals. Sometimes the flow of cases received and completed changes during a specific period in a way that shifts the date backwards. The processing timeframes shown on our webpage reflect applications just completed. So the page is only a tool for customers to estimate our current processing times.
In addition, the average processing times posted on our website do not take into account the many issues that may arise when a particular case is under review. For example, sometimes a USCIS officer may need to ask for additional information before a final decision can be made. If your case has been delayed beyond our posted processing times and you have not been asked for additional information, we encourage you to call our customer service line at 1-800-375-5283 to inquire about the status of your case.
Some of you also asked about the long wait for employment-based visas. The law limits how many people can immigrate in these employment based preference categories each year. That determines how many cases we can complete and often establishes how many new cases we can accept. To complicate matters, demand often far exceeds that supply. To assist applicants who are awaiting those visas, we will soon begin to issue Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) that are valid for 2 years for certain applicants who filed an application to adjust their status to permanent resident but are still awaiting an immigrant visa number.
Others have asked why petitions for their relatives take so long to process. Usually, it’s because an immigrant visa simply isn’t available. More than 1 million petitions to sponsor a relative are still awaiting visas. USCIS must manage our work based on the number of visas allowed by law. To change that, Congress would have to amend the law. No USCIS employee wants to keep a family apart or withhold proof of eligibility to work, but we must work within the requirements set by law.
Our current immigration system challenges us with backlogs on a regular basis. During the past fiscal year, we’ve begun to make improvements that will permanently eliminate future backlogs, including hiring additional employees, instituting new business processes and technology, and creating a new employee culture focused on professional training and development.
Will we succeed overnight? No. Making these changes—the right way—will take longer than my tenure as Acting Director. Nonetheless, we’re committed to making them sooner rather than later.
Thanks for taking time to read this entry.
Jonathan “Jock” Scharfen
Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
[* update: Changed "our" to "are."]
But most of all, you want to know when USCIS will complete your case. Let me try to address some of your concerns.
After visiting local USCIS offices around the country and reviewing our current production statistics, I am confident USCIS will beat our projected 13- to 15-month processing estimate for completing naturalization applications filed after June 1, 2007—while we continue to improve processing times for other applications and petitions. Next month, we will provide you with a detailed report with updated processing times for all USCIS offices.
Our employees are hard at work every day, including evenings and weekends, processing files and interviewing applicants. The results of their efforts show tremendous productivity. I am optimistic that USCIS will exceed our goal of completing more than 1 million naturalization applications this fiscal year, which ends September 30, compared to last year’s 748,000 naturalization cases. And so far, applications received have been lower than normal this year. If that continues, we’ll bring processing times down further than we projected.
Many of you also asked about the processing times displayed at http://www.uscis.gov/, and why the dates sometimes go backward rather than forward. We estimate those dates based on a formula that calculates, among other things, the number of cases received within a defined period, how many cases we’ve completed during that time period, and how many cases remain in process that are [*] beyond our established processing time goals. Sometimes the flow of cases received and completed changes during a specific period in a way that shifts the date backwards. The processing timeframes shown on our webpage reflect applications just completed. So the page is only a tool for customers to estimate our current processing times.
In addition, the average processing times posted on our website do not take into account the many issues that may arise when a particular case is under review. For example, sometimes a USCIS officer may need to ask for additional information before a final decision can be made. If your case has been delayed beyond our posted processing times and you have not been asked for additional information, we encourage you to call our customer service line at 1-800-375-5283 to inquire about the status of your case.
Some of you also asked about the long wait for employment-based visas. The law limits how many people can immigrate in these employment based preference categories each year. That determines how many cases we can complete and often establishes how many new cases we can accept. To complicate matters, demand often far exceeds that supply. To assist applicants who are awaiting those visas, we will soon begin to issue Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) that are valid for 2 years for certain applicants who filed an application to adjust their status to permanent resident but are still awaiting an immigrant visa number.
Others have asked why petitions for their relatives take so long to process. Usually, it’s because an immigrant visa simply isn’t available. More than 1 million petitions to sponsor a relative are still awaiting visas. USCIS must manage our work based on the number of visas allowed by law. To change that, Congress would have to amend the law. No USCIS employee wants to keep a family apart or withhold proof of eligibility to work, but we must work within the requirements set by law.
Our current immigration system challenges us with backlogs on a regular basis. During the past fiscal year, we’ve begun to make improvements that will permanently eliminate future backlogs, including hiring additional employees, instituting new business processes and technology, and creating a new employee culture focused on professional training and development.
Will we succeed overnight? No. Making these changes—the right way—will take longer than my tenure as Acting Director. Nonetheless, we’re committed to making them sooner rather than later.
Thanks for taking time to read this entry.
Jonathan “Jock” Scharfen
Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
[* update: Changed "our" to "are."]
Labels: immigration, USCIS
669 Comments:
Hey Jonathan, Thanks for giving us a realistic picture.
It is good to know that the processing dates are NOTHING but a formula. May be you want to put that in fine print somewhere on the result page and let people know that it is just a guess, not facts.
You know the 1-800-375-5283 number? i think all of us applicants have used it at least once, and you know what? it doesn't tell us anything more than we already know from the website. So why even bother with putting staff on that line? They don't tell us anything, no estimated time, no nothing.
You're confident that the cases will be done before 14-15 months, does that count the 3 million pending name checks? it's easy to shift the responsibility to the FBI isn't it? Have you been separated from your family for 3 years? That's what we're going through, we follow your rules, we pay as requested, we just want a reasonable treatment.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 11:45 AM
i know people who have had their 2008 applications approved. It seems USCIS is skewing their data/processing times by randomly picking a few 08 applications to approve thereby cutting down the processing times data. This is a violation of the FIFO and I'm not sure how to report it, but if IO's are trying to speed up their times, someone should look into it. Thanks (this is the buzz on many forums, so it's not a secret).
By
Tracy, At
June 23, 2008 11:58 AM
Thank you sir for your comment. It was quite informative. I would like to ask however can there be a premium processing for those with pending i-360 applications whose R1 visa's are almost expired like you have for those with almost expired H1 visa's who have pending i-460 applications? This will really make life easier.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:15 PM
No Hope !!!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:17 PM
May I ask why Vermont is so much slower to process K3s than California? And why are K1s getting the priority over K3s? Why would an engaged couple take priority over a married couple that is separated? All anecdotal evidence points to Vermont being much slower than CA and the sudden ramp up of approved K1s points to the priority being shifted. As a tax paying US citizen of 26 years, I am losing faith in USCIS.
(disclaimer, we applied almost 7 months ago for a K3 and we've yet to receive the second NOA2.)
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:18 PM
Thank you for your updates. I am glad to see that there is are potential "progress" in place. However, I am not sure if the priority is in the right order. Understandably, people wants to be naturalized which would enable our politicians to collect more votes. However, family-based petitions should be a priority. Once does not know the pain and stress inflicted being away from your spouse, children, and family. If USCIS truly cares, I urge you to put more focus on allowing family to be united than going through this painful waiting process. Thank you for your time!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:20 PM
What about those who filed for their I-140 and I-485 last July and still hasn't received their biometrics/fingerprinting schedule, How long is the processing time before they get fingerprinted? Does it take 1 year to get a schedule? You didn't mention anything about biometrics schedule.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:22 PM
For those who are already here in the US and are petitioning for naturalization or other status, I understand the frustration of waiting. However, I don't think there is any pain more severe than waiting for a loved one to be united.
It is unfair that family have to endure long waits. We all emphasize the important of family and the process USCIS has at the moment is a hindrance to family unity. Bring family together!! As a citizen, his is where my government has failed most!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:42 PM
Good after noon JOnathan, I am a JAMAICAN, AND I MARRIED A UNITED STATES CITIZEN, HE HAS JUST STARTED THAT FILING, HOW LONG WILL THE PROCESS TAKES TO COME THROUGH????? JUST AN ESTIMATE TIME.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:45 PM
Im still waiting for my NOA-2 from I-130 in Vermont. Vermont just refuses to do everything by the book. I've seen people get their I-130's approved when they filed in MARCH/APRIL and I am from December and Still waiting. My wife has run out of funds and i tried to expedite, but they didnt even request any info straight denial. USCIS agents spit on our families. Most disturbing, I will have to sell my business stop paying goverment 200k a year in taxes and go live over seas with my wife. Thanks
By
Buya89, At
June 23, 2008 12:51 PM
I think what USCIS needs to work on is to restore public faith in USCIS. The reputation of USCIS has been damaged beyond repair because of years of inefficiency and bureaucracy. I can see it is a daunting task for the new leader. I just want to say: "Good Luck! Do not give us a blank check and let us down again!"
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:52 PM
I have contacted the 1-800number many times.They do not give you anything more than what is on the website. We have submitted the paperwork almost 2 years ago for a work permit and have received the same comment that it's pending.The operators are not helpful and all they tell you is that they will send an email to the site where your case is filed. I understand a certain amount of time should be expected for a back log. If all the forms were filled out correctly and you haven't received any requests for additional paperwork then why the delay?? Though your updates shows that at least someone is looking to inform the public about what is going on it still leaves me with no answers.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:58 PM
Why does K-1 and K-3 takes too long to be approved? What is the big deal to approve the K-1 & K-3 Visa? Can you imagine the pain that is caused to be apart from the person you love, that you choose to be your partner in life for life?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:58 PM
The response below is where we have been stuck since September 2007 and each time we keep on getting told someone is dealing with it...The process is very painful for families and I hope you don't just play lip service but do something about the issues raised.
Application Type: I129F, PETITION FOR FIANCE(E)
Current Status: This case has been received from the State Department with a request we review it.
On September 14, 2007, a USCIS office received this case from the State Department with a request that we review it. We will notify you when we complete our review, or if we need something from you.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 12:58 PM
Well, my naturalization priority date is 3/15/2007 and I am still waiting for the interview notice. So, I don't have any confidence about the 13-15 month processing time.
The problem with USCIS is cases fall out of cracks and no one bother to check on them
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:00 PM
Hey Jonathan, Thanks for at least talking about the processing times.
L1 dependent visa i.e. L2 visa holders are eligible to work here. But if the L2 visa extension is not done, the L2 visa holder can file the EAD, but amazingly even if principle L1 extension is already accomplished, EAD decision is not done.
If L1 visa is extended then what can be the technical difficulties to approve the L2 visa. Except the background check, what else USCIS has to do with this L2 visa.
Again even if USCIS, doesn't work on L2 visa, they should at least give some temporary EAD through local USCIS offices.
When we visit the local USCIS office, the officers there just calls the USCIS office and tells us that "unfortunately we can't do anything with this. You need to stay here"
I am here for more that 9 months and almost 8 months have passed after applying the L2 extension. My husband's L1 visa came just in one month. I have applied for extension and EAD too. But still my extension is not yet done and so the EAD.
USCIS should at least allow the temporary EAD for such people unless the L2 extension decision is not taken. I am double post graduate and in such a way USCIS is wasting my talent and making me frustated. I am like house arrested and even can't get the driver's license.
The processing time is moving forward and backward and even sometimes is same after a month. This is simply frustating.
L2 visa holders are eligible to work in US. This should make them separate from H4 visa holders. Even if the extension for H4 visa don't come early ,it will not matter much for them as they have to stay at home by law. But for L2 visa holders , this matters. So please do not count L and H dependent visa holders in same category.
In summary I would like to suggest USCIS the following:
1. When 180-240 days passed after applying for extension of L2 visa, USCIS should give some temporary EAD to L2 visa holders.
2. The L2 visas which are pending with USCIS National Benefits Center and whose principle L1 visa is extended already should delegate the work to the corresponding local offices to handle and speed up the work.
3. Please give the priority to L2 visa holders over the other dependent visas.
We are getting frustated here and just blaming our fate and quality of work going on. Seriously speaking ,we follow your rules, we pay as requested, we just want a reasonable treatment.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:03 PM
No one has realy made mention about the I-130's the processing date haven't moved since June 200, I hope that their will be some processing date changes very soon.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:04 PM
Thank you for the info...but why is premium processing for the I140 NOT available for everyone? I'm on my 9th H-1B extension, filed for my I-140/I-1485 already ...and this month, USCIS announced that it's only available for people who are on their 6th year of H-1B and expiring in 60 days... I know life is not always fair, but this doesn't make any sense at all.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:09 PM
Please bring back Premium Processing for I-140 for everyone ASAP... It doesn't make sense that it's only available for people on their 6th year of H-1B expiring in 60 days...what about those who are already on their 9th with a pending I-140/I485??? It just doesn't make sense!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:11 PM
Hi Jonathan,
Did your team look into the following issues:
- Why are employment petitions that have visa numbers available (eg EB1C) still not processed and are backlogged?
- Why are the USCIS approving 2008 applications so that that can easily bring down average reporting times (As reported to you) at the expense of those who filed earlier. This is is being done just to fudge the processing times numbers in reports coming to you and for no other reason. They should be held accountable for attempting to misrepresent the real processing delay situation to you.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:19 PM
I'd like to understand why VSC takes so much longer to process I-751 (removal of conditions) than CSC. Now that there are only 2 service centers processing removal of conditions, and CSC is so much faster (I've seen on forums that many people who are at VSC have been waiting for a year, while there are others at CSC who applied in March of this year, are already approved).
Personally, I want to become a US citizen as soon as possible, I'm delighted and privileged to be here with my husband, and yet I know that I will be waiting at least a year to process the removal of conditions, and I will be eligible for citizenship probably before my I-751 is adjudicated. That seems to be an inefficient use of USCIS resources...
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:20 PM
Wow! I think it is great that the acting director of USCIS is willing to open this public conversation. I hope you don't get discouraged by the deluge of comment. I only have a comment. I know that you have inherited the Summer of 2007 application overload fiasco and that USCIS is making a big effort to catch up, and we appreciate it. My comment is that to make matters worse some USCIS local offices are way slower than others. In particular I have been waiting for a N-600 (application for certificate of citizenship) for my child for ten months already. I sent my application to the the San Jose office. The San Jose office has been consistently slower than the San Francisco office year after year. I think something should be done to remedy this long standing situation and make the San Jose office, and all the rest of slower offices, as fast as the others. It is possible that the employees of San Jose office work as hard or harder than the employees of San Francisco, perhaps the trick is to open another office, share the load. I don't want to propose a particular solution but just to point to the unfairness to which some people are subjected just by accident of their place of residence.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:26 PM
Sir, all your statements and promoses seem false. USCIS seems to be functioning in a manner that is best classified as completely erratic - my question to you is - where does the accountability lie? The processing times keep moving back and forth - while at the same the actual approval of cases happens in a completely erratic manner. Cases filed much later get approved within a relatively short period of times whereas others that were filed much earlier have no updated. Calling the USCIS customer services center is completly useless too. One can never get a response that makes any sense!
Sir, you and your staff need to understand that each application no. has an indiviual and his or her family attached to it. You play with the lives of people here.......I am surprised that your agents can even sleep at night after doing such a pathetic job.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:27 PM
while I can appreciate the challenge put forth by sheer volume of applications and complexity of running a shop as critical and as complex as the USCIS, i think the director fails to address the following:
1) Vermont Service Center is standstill on processing K-3 and IR1/CR1 visa for immediate relatives such as spouses of US Citizens, while California Service Center is spitting them out quickly
2) Incosistencies in approvals. Some take 3 months to be approved. Some take 1 year. Both with same background.
3) De-priortization of the applications filed by US Citizens for their spouses over H-1 visa holder spouses and K-1 fiance visa filers. This is not only illogical, but an injustice to the citizens.
I used to work on a trading floor, so I can relate and appreciate the challenge put forth by high volumes. It's how you deal with them and still give your customer timely executions shows how good of a leader you are.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:30 PM
Thank you Jonathan for clarification regarding the processing of employment based petitions. Just to make it clear, the majority of the comments posted in your previous blog entry "We're listening" were regarding the unreasonable & excessive delay on processing of employment based petitions (I-140 & I-485) and not that of naturalization (even though they too are facing delays).
I would understand if the reason for delay in processing of I-485's due to lack of visa numbers, but why is there a delay in processing I-140 petitions? Processing of I-140 DOES NOT require a visa number, right? My I-140 petition has been transferred from NSC to VSC to TSC and has been pending for more than year now. Why is there some many tranfers being done, if the reason for the transfer is work load balancing & quicker processing? In spite of these multiple transfers, my case has been pending at TSC for close to 8 months now. Can you please instruct TSC to complete processing pending I-140 petitions? Also, the Premium Processing reinstated is so narrowly defined, I would be surprised if even 5% of the pending I-140 petitions would benefit from it? What use it for majority of us folks? I urge to resinstate PPS for I-140 with immediate efffect and also instruct TSC to expedite processing of I-140 petitions (especially the ones that got transferred multiple times). Your kind help would be much appreciated
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:31 PM
Mr. Director, thank you very much the update. We wish you all the best with your continued efforts with streamlining the processes and improving efficiency at USCIS.
I'd like to draw your attention to EB3/India/Concurrent/July I-140 filers. Extremely few people with this combination of factors have been approved. I know you said that such persons should call the toll-free number, but I'm not talking about any specific case but this "category" in general. We heard about something called Plus Pilot Program -which while very well intentioned for overall efficiency- holds this category back.
As EB3-India is severely retrogressed and many applicants would like to use AC21. However, they want to wait for I-140 to be approved to be on the safer side. Not getting an I-140 approval, combined with the severe retrogression is like a one-two punch for EB3-India applicants. Could you please ensure that they get at least I-140 approvals on their turn instead of being held back. We'll appreciate your comments in this regard.
I'd like to wrap up my comments by mentioning how much we appreciate your journal comments as well as the opportunity to talk back. I can assure you that it makes the drastic improvements in USCIS's image in public and your earn our well-deserved goodwill.
Best Regards.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:35 PM
Thank you Jonathan for the update.
I share somehow the same frustration with some of the people that posted their comments here. I applied for my green card last year and am still waiting to hear when my adjustment of status and I140 will be approved. I'm in the EB2 category that supposes to help expedite my application and it doesn't seem to help at all.
There is no real status information provided by anyone (either on the web site and/or the CS number).
I need to renew my EAD soon which means that I'll have to pay another $1,000 dollars (includes my wife's EAD)in order to get those documents.
Shouldn't the USCIS renew my documents at no cost knowing that I'm not the one delaying this process?
Thank you!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:36 PM
How about the employment visa numbers your department has wasted over the period of years ? For so many years even though supply of visa number was there but your department did not complete those cases in time and let numbers go waste.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:36 PM
Hi Jonathan,
I am not sure what you meant by "I am confident USCIS will beat our projected 13- to 15-month processing estimate for completing naturalization applications filed after June 1, 2007"
We are already in the 13th month of processing.
Thanks,
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:40 PM
It's a joke that it takes longer for a US citizen to bring home his/her spouse than a non citizen H1B worker to bring his/her spouse to America.
Stop giving us this kind of corporate talk, get out of NATO (Talk Only No Action). America is the only first world country in the world that spouses/families apart for years thanks to USCIS.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:40 PM
Hi Jock,
Thanks for taking time to write this article; at least we know that someone is taking responsibility of getting things done (at least in writing). I got so much to complain about USCIS inefficiencies, but that won’t get me anywhere. I’ll just save myself with heartaches & headaches by not complaining and being miserable, rather I’ll try to be optimistic about the future of USCIS and be positive about the changes your office is doing. With no immigration reform in the horizon, I don’t think USCIS could do much in issuing more visas. On the second thought, there is this “visa recapture” that you can take a look closer. Hopefully this fiscal year, your office could maximize it and not loose any single visas that are a “life-line” to us immigrants. Again, I’m trying to be optimistic! As for me, since I have to option but to wait, PLEASE continue to update us as often as possible and share to us the progress you’re making. At least this will help us a bit alleviate the anxiousness of waiting in vain.
By
Pinoy, At
June 23, 2008 1:41 PM
Good day !
Thanks for the update and for making something at USCIS. Your efforts and your staff are highly appreciated.
It seems that you are very particular with naturalization issue. How about the permanent residency issue, I guess you need to discuss more on this also. How long should it take(time frame) to get a green card.
One more thing, how about the H1B lottery? Is it done already? Any update on this.
Many thanks and have a wonderful day!
Anonymous
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:43 PM
Hi Jock,
Thanks for taking time to write this article; at least we know that someone is taking responsibility of getting things done (at least in writing). I got so much to complain about USCIS inefficiencies, but that won’t get me anywhere. I’ll just save myself with heartaches & headaches by not complaining and being miserable, rather I’ll try to be optimistic about the future of USCIS and be positive about the changes your office is doing. With no immigration reform in the horizon, I don’t think USCIS could do much in issuing more visas. On the second thought, there is this “visa recapture” that you can take a look closer. Hopefully this fiscal year, your office could maximize it and not loose any single visas that are a “life-line” to us immigrants. Again, I’m trying to be optimistic! As for me, since I have to option but to wait, PLEASE continue to update us as often as possible and share to us the progress you’re making. At least this will help us a bit alleviate the anxiousness of waiting in vain.
By
Pinoy, At
June 23, 2008 1:43 PM
IF you have a heart, PLEASE put family based petition a priority. The LONG waiting process has been both emotionally and physically painful. You do not know how heartbreaking it is to hear your wife crying EVERYDAY missing her husband and likewise how emotional it is for a grown man to cry because he misses his wife just as much. The stress of going through this process has been very tough on my family. With the added stress, my wife and I have lost the opportunity to expand our family as a result of a miscarriage. I blame USCIS process for our lost due to the added stress! I hope you and the people who make legislation can feel good about yourself, denying our unborn child life because of the undue stress you put upon us!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:48 PM
Greetings,
I completely acknowledge the multifarious issues facing the USCIS in processing applications. While many long term steps are being taken to make the process efficient, a few things can be done immediately to make the process more transparent -
1. Follow FIFO - it is unfair that TSC processes Dec 07 I-140s while July/Aug 07 applications are still pending. If this is a deliberate attempt atleast communicate this with everyone giving reasons/strategies
2. There is no guidance on why cases are transferred between offices, and how they are going to be processed. Infact, lot of transferred cases are pending for a long long time.
3. Be more forthcoming with the issues being faced..so that all clients know when to expect their cases to be processed.
In short, even with the multiple problems facing the organization, be fair in processing applications and transparent about your policies. Dont keep us in the dark.
"The certainty of misery is lot better than the misery of uncertainty"
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 1:51 PM
hi Mr Jonathan Sir,
Please tell me sir, how long I-130 file will take to process my wife in the USA for 5 years and she just applied for USA citizenship and it's takes almost 13 to 15 months so you tell me how long do I have to wait for . I have been waiting for Petition file to open for 3 and half years.I think you should understand people who got married ,give them visa as fast as you can because husband and wife is different kind of case than uncle, aunt etc.I hope you will work on this comment. Thanking you
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:01 PM
I just comment something about the increases in cost for all the applications, simply it makes no sense to pay more for a service that is taking longer if your process is goingo to last more than before why don't you reduce your cost too. For you is easy to take the money from the people and later makes any stuped excuse, and aditional to this you force us to stay in the country because if we travel to visit our familys is like discontinued our residency in the Unites States. Why at least don't permit us to travel to see our relatives...
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:04 PM
Good post Jock. This is great information and we need more of it. USCIS needs a full-time blog much like TSA's Evolution of Security. Daily updates (not monthly or quarterly numbers).
As someone who works at DHS and with USCIS in the past, I think it is important that USCIS provide more information directly to citizens. This will help clear up a number of the myths of USCIS and help people understand how the process truly works. A blog is a great format to do this and TSA's blog has been quite successful. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me (sressler at gmail).
By
Stephen, At
June 23, 2008 2:06 PM
Am extremely happy and satisfied for what ever you could do in spite of being an "Acting Director". Definitely, we are not expecting overnight changes. All we request is a plain, transparent process so that we know what can be a realistic time frame to get our employment based green card. Thank you for extending the validity period for EAD . Can you please do the same for Advance Parole too ?
By
Sridhar, At
June 23, 2008 2:08 PM
Mr. Acting Director
thank you for watching blogs or reading blogs and writing after reading the comments. Very wise, keep up that at least, which gives fuel to many aspirants here for the hope.
My question is, can you respond to one of the com mentors' question ?
How long does it take to even process the fingerprint(biometrics) for those applicants who has paid their due, accepted applications and waiting for biometrics. In the event that our time for application process starts, they will see no biometrics and hence another 6-9 months delay. Don't you feel shame on commending your worker's efficiency ?
I have called your toll free number for many times in the hope that biometrics would be processed one day, all in vain. The responder(the efficient worker) on the other side of the phone brings different message every time you call.
(i) sir, I have re-submitted it for processing, and you should be getting an schedule in mail within a month, if not give us a call. Why do you want again a call ? Why don't you fix your damn printer..before giving a wrong information to the customer.
(ii)Sir, I can do nothing but will ask the service center and here is your service request number, to be followed by a letter in 60 days that nothing is done. Your application is within scheduled time for processing.
(iii) Sir, I could not find your file, please take an infopass and they can help you processing biometrics.
(iv) at info pass. Sir, I cannot find your application, please re-submit or send whatever you have as a proof of document of your application submission.
(v) service center. Sir, your application is here with us in this service center, the request for biometrics is submitted, but because your nearest processing center is overwhelmed with all other applicants and hence you are getting delayed for scheduling biometrics.
the same service center can fit my schedule for EAD, but not for I-485 biometrics.
(vi) Can you please investigate these people who answered me their own version of answers and train ?
I have their employee number or Names as they gave me in each call I made.
(vii) And please think yourself being in one of the immigrant's position, think legally, no need to be illegal. But you would definitely not want to be ill-informed.
Thanks
One of your system's administrator.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:09 PM
Jock,
Industry uses lots of prediction algorithms and data mining methods. I am sure, as an engineer myself, that technology and innovative means can be of tremendous help. For example - (1) you could train your work force on more advanced tools to handle cases (2) more importantly you shoudl make more and more forms/applciation info online filing that will reduce the burden of processing. I bet a lot of volenteers sitting around in wannabe immigrants who could do this for you for free (3) a more accurate processing time, wait time is definitely worth looking into. The 'formula' can always be improved, and it should be. maybe it could be taken to some statistician researchers - US schools are full of them - Stanford, MIT, list id endless.
All in all, I can see the bottleneck being 'law imposed limited visa numbers' but there is clearly lot of improvements waiting to happen. The frustration of immigrants is real and is coutner productive for economy. Having advanced degree holders and their eligible spouses limit (or kill) their ability to work or move around jobs due to either or both the beurocracy or law in theor most prodcutive twenties and thirties is a big blow of economic growth and to personal satisfaction. and in competitive environment, waiting for changes 'longer than your tenure' is not an option. I am not being sarcastic sir, it needs more attention. Thank you for being candid but can you not push, on your end, to lawmakers for serious thoughts into this matter. Imagine if Sergey Brin (google's co-founder) would have to delay or drop Gooogle idea simply b/c his I-140 or 485 is not yet approved Or even worse, not eligible to apply sue to retrogression.
regards
an unapologetic tinkerer
Manish
By
Manish, At
June 23, 2008 2:16 PM
Mr. Director,
First of all, I appreciate your keeping this blog alive and let us to continue to input our comment. As a victim of long delayed FBI name check, I wish you can write your comment regarding this background check delay, but to my disappointment, I can not find it from your comment.
I believe that you have already read the FBI name check audit report issued by Inspector General of Department of Justice (http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0824/final.pdf), before you wrote your comment on this blog. The report pointed out a lot of problem on the current name check process -
Inaccurate, out-dated technology and poor management etc, as compared to the accurate, efficient, well managed finger print process. I don't understand why your USCIS adapt such poor process to delay our immigration benefit, put our life to limbo and put our family apart,
Clearly for many citizenship applicants, it is not the visa availability issue and law issue that put our family apart, it is the bureaucratic issue. Worst part is that your name check process doesn't achieve the goal to protect our country's safety due to its out dated technology. Instead, it has just ruined the life of many law-abiding immigrants. I really feel sorry for our country and many innocent people including myself after I read the audit report. Mr. Director, please seriously takes the audit report into consideration, and gives us an explanation on how you can eliminate the FBI name check backlog by the time line USCIS proposed and why you still consider this process as an invaluable tool to protect our safety and find the bad people, as criticized as inaccurate and out-dated technology by the inspector general.
I sincerely wish you will not avoid this outstanding issue on your next comment. Thanks again.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:17 PM
Hi Jock,
Thank you for taking the time in providing the information. My mother is a U.S. Citizen, so were my grandfather (who served in the U.S. Marines for 32 years) and my uncles (who each served in the U.S. Army for 20 years). I was granted the "Permanent Resident" status 7 years ago while living in Central America. (I was born there because of my grandfather deployment to the area). I called the 800 number several times to ask about my rights and was always given different information, including that I was a U.S. Citizen by birth and did not need to apply for my U.S. Citizenship. I was told that all I neeed to do was to apply for my U.S. Passport. It was denied, and to make a long story short, I lost one whole year communciating back and forth until I finally decided to take the long way and applied for my U.S. Citizenship as any other immigrant. I did so on July last year. My fingerprints were taken in December and have not received any information ever since. At the same time, I made a petition for my husband in 2002, the process was supposed to take 900 days and it took 5 years, in which he was living overseas, while my 2 kids and I, were working our way up here without any kind of assistance. At the time he came over and started to settle down, we realized that after 5 years of separation we had changed so much that we ended up in a separation. This is what the current system is doing to hard working families who had contributed to this country in many possitive ways. I really hope you can improve the lack of professionalism and knowledge of your employees so other families don't have to go through what my family and I went through.
Thanks,
Agreed!
By
Agreed, At
June 23, 2008 2:17 PM
Jonathan,
Thank you for actually listening to / reading our comments. I am EB2 ROW that applied in the infamous July-August 2007 period for I-140 and I-485. It is almost a year and no news and I see people who applied in 2008 (January, February, March etc..) approved left, right and center. How is that possible? I am current and have been all the time so visa number is not an issue. I do not believe that this is fair treatment. If I am from non-current country, I would understand that I have to wait for visa number but that is not the case. Regarding processing times - is it possible to split them between current (ROW) and non-current countries? Because right now if someone from India who applied in July will have to wait for 4 years to get visa number would it not drag down the processing times for everyone else? Honestly, what happened in July '07 was a major disaster for ROW applicants. They could have got I-140 done under premium processing in 2-3 weeks and I-485 in three-four months prior to infamous July-August 2007. That is all gone and not sure when we will return to that situation.
Again - thanks for listening.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:18 PM
Dear Jock,
Couple of comments. (i) Have you noticed the number of anonymous messages that you have: ever wonder why people are so frightened to identify themselves? (ii) I am a member of Trackitt.com, where 15,000 I-485 & I-140 applicants have added their immigration experiences into one database. It is clear as crystal from the trackitt database that USCIS does not complete these applications in chronological order; in fact there is no obvious order at all. For example, just today an applicant from Jan 2008 received their I-140 approval. There are many, many, many applicants waiting from the July 2007 fiasco and many, many applicants from long before this. What is the explanation? Common belief (as stated above) is that USCIS is fudging their numbers by padding old approval statistics with newer applications. Is this true? If not, please tell me what is the reason for the absence of chronology?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:19 PM
This is a good article. Following are some of my observations on EB1 cases
1) A lot of EB1 cases are yet to be approved whereas EB2 and EB3 cases are turning up like hot cakes?
2) A lot of primary EB1 applicants are approved. The EB2 cases for their spouses - derivatives (as per Immigration officers) are with officers. Why not approve these cases asap?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:19 PM
Thank you for your updates,I am LPR and file my fedral,local taxes, pay taxes have my driving lic,s.s number as every citizen of this country have,obey the law,well i have file my petition for my wife on 2005,its almost 3 years and i havent heard from USCIS and when every i call they tell me that my case is in process for last 3 years why its taking long time to process why visa is not avaiable just to bring the spouse that u have married her and she has right to live with you.when its said that US respect family and liberity.all LPR should treat as US citizen when they want to sponsor their spouse and children,why we dont pay taxes?so why is discrimination?we need voice so the congress can hear.i know people who come on F1 can bring s/he spouse on F4 visa same as H1 holder can bring spouse on H4 visa that i cannot understand afterwards they change into greencard.smart way ..when we follow the law they screw us up.This system need to change. I WANT MY WIFE RIGHT WAY AS SAME AS US CITIZEN IT SHOULD BE NOT WAIT LINE.WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF YOUR SPOUSE BEEN SPERATE FROM YOU?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:22 PM
I am extremely disappointed by the service rendered by the USCIS. Most of us had to pay thousands of dollars to file I-140s and I-485s last year ($2,265). The service we get is deplorable and this is a shame.
1) The processing times is a lie. People like me who filed in july 07 are still waiting while some who filed in 2008 already have answers.
2) Is this a way for USCIS to get more money. Yes we avoided the fee hike, just to renew EADs and APs at a much higher cost.
3) You justified the fee hike for a better service, it is worse now
4) You justified the increased in processing times by twice more applications. You also supposedly hired some people. So how come that processing time are now 10 times longer than before (they should have been maybe twice longer, not over ten times).
3) I am not even talking about opening service requests. After 3 attempts, and a month wait each time, the answer we get is: "We are actively processing your case, get back to us in 6 months." Is this a joke, or are you serious.
We want to do it lawfully, and abide by the rules. Why don't you? We are honest people trying to make a living and the USCIS is profiting from it, along with employers. We are not idiots, at least you should show us some respect by telling the truth.
Thank you for making our lives miserable.
By
Mounir, At
June 23, 2008 2:24 PM
Good article. I have a straightforward question
1) My EB1-C got approved 2 months ago. My spouse (derivative) is still pending. Both of us applied together. My spouse's case is with officer (as per IO) since last 2 months. Why is it not approved?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:24 PM
Please bring back i-140 Premium Processing for all applicants. Its been 11 months since I applied and there is abosolutely no update. The representatives on the 1800 number you mentioned repeat what is mentioned on the website.. Newer applications are getting approved faster.... Approval of i140 is very important for us or make portability [AC21] for unapproved i140s more flexible...
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:30 PM
HI DIRECTOR HOW CAN WE MAKE THE CONGRESS amend THE LAW SO WE CAN GET A VISA FOR OUR RELATIVES. WHAT WE NEED TO DO FOR THIS CHANGE TO HAPPEN. SO WE DONT HAVE TO WAIT THAT LONG TO HAVE OUR RELATIVES LIVING WITH US HERE. I WOULD APPRECIATE IF YOU CAN EXPLAIN THIS TO US SO WE CAN TAKE ACTION IN ORDER TO SEE THEIR REACTION.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:33 PM
Thank you for addressing some issues which are critical to us, the ones waiting for an adjudication.
While I understand the Naturalization priority in an election year, I'd like to point out to the all the other applications from July/Aug last year, many of which have not been processed. It seems that the FIFO system does not apply in the case of the July/Aug filled Employment Based petitions. We see approvals from Oct, Nov 2007 or even March 2008. Also availability of visa numbers seems not to be a criteria. I'm a Rest of the World applicant, there are visa numbers available, processing times passed my application date, but it's still pending. This shows me there is ineficiency in the system that could be maybe addressed by reinstating Premium Processing. Please reinstate Premium Processing for more cases than just 6th year H1B applicants.
As a side note, calling customer service does not really help, they're rude and provide information that is already available on the website. Nothing that pertains to our personal case.
Thanks again for listening.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:33 PM
While it is great that you are still engaged and seem to be responding to some of the comments and frustrations I think there is more you can do to get a realistic picture of what the 1-800 number is all about. Go to a local office and ask a couple of the applicants there for an Infopass if they would call the 1-800 number and listen in to what happens. There is no help at all available from this service.
I applied in September 2005. Name check was initiated in January 2006 and I have had nothing since then. Each time I call I am told to call again in 6 months/90 days/30 days. At least get the agents to be honest and say they what is happening in general, even if it is not good news. Providing a random response to get me off the phone is not good.
By
Ken, At
June 23, 2008 2:40 PM
Thank you for the updates.
Please implement FIFO for all the cases filed with USCIS not just for one or two case types. Provide more access/information to call center employees so that they can give us more details when we call 1-800 number.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:42 PM
HI, I DID MY INTERVIEW AND PASSED IN AUGUST 2007,SINCE THAT DAY, EVERYTIME I CALL.. THEY JUST TELL ME WE HAVE NO INOFORMATION , WILL 30 DAYS. ITS BEEN 10 MONTH NOW AND NOTHING HAPPEN .. WHERER CAN I GO . I DID AN APPOIMNET BUT STILL HAVE NO ANSWER FOR ME.:(
IS IT COZ MY LAST NAME IS ARABIC ?!!!
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:45 PM
Thank you Sir for taking time and addressing some issues.
I am stuck in the GC voyage for past several years. Being from a capped country, it is very painful to see other filers who have filed after you getting approvals. I just want to let you know that unnecessary delays and inefficiencies at USCIS hurt common families like mine to a great extent. With my I-485 application I also applied for EAD. They misspelled my name wrong in I-485 and EAD and after several requests no action is taken while now I have to renew the EAD again and not sure if they will misspell it again. Your folks may be working fast but they are not paying attention to details. I cant find out if my name check has been cleared also. USCIS has told me that my I-485 name error will be corrected while someone will adjudicate my case. What if after a long wait someone finally gets to my case and then he sends my name again for a name check and then my country retrgresses again. I feel like I am in in Black hole. Please, Sir do something to make the system more effective. I appreciate your time.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:46 PM
While I understand that you are making an effort to reduce the backlog from the huge number of applications from June 2007 what about those that are still pending from before this date? My Spousal Green Card has been waiting since November 2006 despite having passed the interview and having my I-130 approved in January of 2007. Where is the effort to clear the old cases?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:47 PM
Jonathan, I thank you for your accountability and visibility. I have lived and worked here for 22 years after emigrating from Jamaica. After losing my green card in a move, I submitted an I-90request today. It is scary and frustrating to think that my contributions to this country as a tax-paying, law-abiding resident may be impacted by red tape. I hope the process QUICKLY serves the good people who simply want to make America greater than ever.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:50 PM
As usual, so many cliche words, so many promises, and ultimately the same routine, except more expensive than the past! How does CIS explaine the $385 fees for a Reentry Permit or Refugee Travel Document and NINE (9) months of wait to issue it? NIne months?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:58 PM
It's nice to have an opportunity to be heard. Two things I would like to mention:
1. Is it possible to give some accurate predictability on how long one has to wait before the petition gets approved and visa number becomes available? Visa bulleting and processing times jump back and forth. People just want to know the time frame and plan accordingly. You know now many petitions are pending and how many gets approved every month. Why this information is not available to general public?
2. I have my EAD approved, received the card, but never received the approval notice. When I called USCIS I was told that I need to order a duplicate and pay $340 for it. This is just unbelievable! Why not $1340 and why do I have to pay at all for this?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 2:59 PM
I would like to thank the entire USCIS for noticable improvement lately on the case processing. You have processed more cases recently than ever before. However, it seems majority of these cases were naturalization applications, can you please focus more efforts on other cases like i-485, i-140 and etc. This is important because emigrants filling for naturalization are better off than those struggling to remain lawfully in the United States.
Thanks
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:09 PM
Dear Sir
Thanks for the detailed information on the processing . Could you please get the 140 processing in Nebraska (EB3) to be expedited. Many of us were on the Labor Backlog for several years to find ourselves in another 140 backlog. I applied for 140 in 2007summer after over 4 years of Labor processing, and would really appreciate it if something could be done about the 140 . In these recession days, it would add stability and improve the quality of our lives. Thank You.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:10 PM
I filed for naturalization in April, 2006. I have not had my interview yet. Can you tell me how much longer I have to wait?
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:10 PM
Jonathan - must be a tough job over there. Its a tough life in the immigration line here too. Tougher to see that it is taking 5-10 years.
Good luck to all of us.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:11 PM
Thank you for putting yourself out front to take such questions. There are a number of issues I would like to draw your attention to.
First, all increased services mentioned in Congressional testimony and press releases are focused only on “Naturalization” applications received. The 1.2-million increase to 3-million applications during the summer of 2007 represents a 60% increase from the previous summer. However, it is not mentioned that “Naturalization” applications only constitute approximately 17% of the revenue collected in FY 2007. Even if you include the almost 10% regular “Adjustment of Status” revenue – this is still only 27%. Yet “Other Applications” comprise 36% of the revenue your agency collected in FY 2007.
In testimony at a House Judiciary Subcommittee on January 17, 2008, former Director Gonzalez presented what was being done to address “Naturalization” delays. It included expanding work hours, adding additional shifts, redirecting staff to service centers, increasing contract staff, and new hires. On March 14, 2008, he reported in a press release that these efforts had reduced processing times by 12-13%. On March 20, 2008, a press release stated that N-400 Naturalization interviews would now be conducted on Saturdays, Sundays, and after traditional business hours. On the right side of the USCIS homepage there remains a comments that staff continue to work extended hours and weekend for "Naturalization" applications.
Therefore, I ask the question: “Explain why a 17% revenue source (Naturalization) merits such a disproportionate amount of time and activity?” Can you please tell me how many staff were hired or redirected to address “Other Applications,” which comprises 37% of your revenue?” Are the staff that deal with “Other Applications” also working Saturdays, Sundays, and extended hours to reduce delayed waiting times? From my vantage point, this certainly does not fit your USCIS Vision Statement, “…becoming a customer-focused innovator of benefits processing.” Perhaps for some, but not all.
Second, why is it that I-129F petitions have the highest fee attributed to them, yet they are the only I-129 petition group that does not qualify for “Premium Processing?” I understand that there may well be many immigrants in various stages of naturalization or work visa’s that might be seeking to bring their betrothed from the country of their origin to be with them in the United States. However, I do not feel US National citizens should be grouped among them when filing the I-129F Fiancée petition. A US National citizen is both a customer and a citizen by birth.
I believe your policy in this area is wrong. According to the USCIS “Core Values,” I do not believe most American people would equate a “high level of integrity” with an immigration system that places preference and expedited services to immigrants over services to its own national citizenry. I do not think this is fair, nor correct. There should be some distinction between a naturalized I-129F K-type visa and a US national I-129F K-type visa.
As a US national citizen and customer I do not like feeling marginalized by an agency that my tax dollars (and those of my ancestors) support, and whose employees my money helps to provide wages and services.
While I agree with the USCIS credo to treat all fairly and equally, There must remain an obvious and necessary distinction between those that are US National Citizens and those that are seeking benefits as Naturalized or visa customers. Afterall, DHS and USCIS are responsible to the US national citizenry, and US Citizens are the largest stakeholders, both in wanting scure borders as well as supporting the agency with revenues derived from taxes. Granted, appropriations amount to slightly less than 10% of all USCIS revenues; however, I am assured that the proportion was greater not so long ago.
Third, why is there such a long period of inactivity from the time a petition/application is receipted to the time processing begins? What becomes of the application during this interim? If you really want to improve service and become “a customer-focused innovator of benefits processing” why don’t you create an Administrative Assistant GS-3 or GS-4 level position to provide an initial screening of petitions received to ensure the application submitted is complete prior to waiting in a pile somewhere before it is noted that a question on a particular form was missed?
Last, why has an I-129F fiancé petition been delayed by 225% compared to processing times earlier in 2007? If FY 2007 naturalization applications increased 60% and USCIS have increased staff and hours of service to deal with that increase, then why has the processing times of I-129F petitions increased to over 225% while N-400 application processing times increased only 160-180%? The only way I can make sense of these numbers is to infer that you took staff away from the budget grouping called "Other Applications" (36%) and shifted them to deal with the "Naturalization" (17%) budget category. Something is wrong – the numbers do not add up.
How do you account for the questions and issues I raise?
By
wlindemans, At
June 23, 2008 3:13 PM
Please look into speeding up the 140 processing in Nebraska especially for Eb3 cases, It seems to be taking forever. Could you give an estimate when August 2007 140 cases would be approved in NSC.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:13 PM
Good day,
I am a Jamaican mother whose children (ages 23 & 18) are both US citizens living in the States since 2001. Prior to my kids migrating, my sister (US citizen) filed an application I-130 for me in January 2001 at the Vermont Centre. The webpage indicates that applications filed up to February 25, 2001 have been completed. Since my date (Jan. 26) is within that time period ... how much longer before I hear from USCIS. I miss my family dearly and would like to hear something soon instead of the same "your case is pending".
Thanks to all the staff of USCIS who are diligent at their job and who believe in uniting families together.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:16 PM
"..Others have asked why petitions for their relatives take so long to process. Usually, it’s because an immigrant visa simply isn’t available. More than 1 million petitions to sponsor a relative are still awaiting visas. USCIS must manage our work based on the number of visas allowed by law. To change that, Congress would have to amend the law. No USCIS employee wants to keep a family apart or withhold proof of eligibility to work, but we must work within the requirements set by law."
who puts the law can change it, we are on the 21st century.
I am sorry, but Whatever you say I can't believe that there is a reason to keep a family apart without an accurate time frame. My 3 years old daughter (who is a US citizen, but her mama is not) asks me on the phone from overseas that she wants to be with me. If she can read, I would e-mail her this article so she can comment on it. I hope no one live apart from his family and not to go through what most of us going through now. I got to wait 2-3 years to unit with my wife and my daughter again. we see on TV how much money was spent to unit sea animals (wheals) together, but not humans.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:23 PM
Why are the Miami Local office is taking too long to approve an employment based case when they already conducted interview. Nebraska give a reason that they transfer cases to speed them up, but excuse me, it seems like in Miami distric office is to forget about our files.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:34 PM
Thanks. I thought I140 suppose to be with "permanent job". Since the visa numbers are not available, why are I140 fillers alraedy in US(with expiring OPT)have to stop working for their "permanent employer". Please, let pending I140(without I485) come with a EAD.
By
Anonymous, At
June 23, 2008 3:40 PM
Mr. Jonathan,
Good day:
Thank you, for taking the time to answered the many many comments!
But my concern still needs an answer.
The answer I seek is, why are I-130 case petitioned for brother/sister at the Vermont office still loging way back at Febuary 2001, while all the other online cases are far far head?
My brother/sister I-130 case was petitioned since April 2001 around seven (7)years and counting, I'm still waiting for an approval!
Best regards,
By
Anonymous, At