The Department’s Five Responsibilities
When President-elect Obama nominated me to become our country’s third Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, I was warned that the vast Department was too cumbersome to lead; that the 225,000-strong workforce was too big to manage; that the 22 agencies with 22 corresponding missions that were brought together in 2003 were too disparate to meld into a coherent structure with a clear vision.Yet, nearly five months into my tenure, the purpose of our Department is unambiguous: we must guard against terrorism; we must secure our borders; we must enforce our immigration laws; we must improve our readiness for, response to, and recovery from disasters; and we must unify the Department so that we can even more effectively carry out our mission.
On each of the five fronts, we have already made important strides.
Protecting the American people from terrorist threats is the founding principle of the Department and our highest priority. This is an effort where everyone--families and communities, first responders, the private sector, state and local governments, as well as the Department--must contribute. My approach is simple: direct every resource available towards prevention and preparedness, and ask Americans to live in a constant state of readiness, not a constant state of fear.
Since January, we have forged new partnerships with our international allies to provide more tools in the fight against terrorism. We have dedicated new resources to detect threats at our transportation hubs and protect our critical infrastructure. And, we are strengthening information-sharing efforts, working hand-in-hand with state, local and tribal law enforcement.
Fulfilling our mission also means securing our borders—our Southern border, our Northern border, and our air and sea ports. Every year, we apprehend and deport more than one million illegal immigrants, no doubt deterring countless more from trying to cross the border. Recently, we announced a new initiative to strengthen security on the Southwest border to disrupt the drug, cash and weapon smuggling that is helping to fuel cartel violence in Mexico.
When it comes to immigration, we need to facilitate legal immigration while we crack down on those who violate our nation’s laws. A few weeks ago, we issued new guidance to our agents in the field to focus our efforts on apprehending criminal illegal aliens and prosecuting employers who knowingly hire illegal workers. At the same time, we are committed to providing employers with the most up-to-date and effective resources to maintain a legal workforce. This new focus is drawing widespread praise--from law enforcement to the business community--because it addresses the root cause of illegal immigration.
As a nation, we must develop a more urgent sense of readiness. Hurricanes happen. Tornadoes happen. Floods happen. And as we recently experienced, so do health outbreaks like the H1N1 flu. The Department plays a critical role in helping communities in all stages of a disaster--preparation, response and long term recovery. Since January, we have worked in close coordination with state and local authorities to respond to severe storms in Arkansas, Kentucky, and Missouri and flooding in North Dakota and Minnesota. We have taken bold new steps to accelerate recovery efforts in the Gulf Coast region, streamlining decision making and consolidating offices to eliminate redundancies.
And we took immediate and aggressive steps to lead the federal government’s efforts to confront the H1N1 flu outbreak.
Finally, we must unify and mature our Department. Our goal is simple: one DHS, one enterprise, a shared vision, with integrated results-based operations. Through a consolidated headquarters, we are bringing 35 locations together. We have launched an expansive efficiency initiative that is leveraging the economies of scale in our Department in order to recover hundreds of millions of dollars and create a culture of responsibility and fiscal discipline.
Throughout these five priority areas, we are applying a series of cross-cutting approaches. We are bolstering cooperation with our partners at the local, tribal, state, federal and international levels; we are expanding our capabilities through the deployment of science and technology while developing and maturing new technologies for tomorrow; and we are maximizing efficiency to ensure every security dollar is spent in the most effective way.
We cannot afford to relent on any of these five fronts because together, they amount to our one overarching mission—a mission whose scope is massive, challenging, and humbling, but also a mission so straightforward and clear that it is contained in our name: securing the homeland.
Janet Napolitano
Labels: About the Department, border security, efficiency, immigration, partnerships, preparedness, response and recovery, science and technology, state and local partnerships, terrorism prevention

25 Comments:
Dear Secretary Napolitano:
With all due respect, DHS has miles to go in improving its services to those individuals who seek immigration benefits. USCIS headquarters has no ability to control or manage the Service Centers who process immigration benefits, and the Centers are out of control. Employers seeking to sponsor temporary and permanent employees are issued overreaching requests for evidence, well-settled policies are ignored, and the culture of "no" is rampant.
I understand that the mission of USCIS is to enforce the regulations, but they are now acting in a manner that can best be described as arbitrary and capricious, impacting hundreds of employers and thousands of workers. Please make the fair adjudication of petitions and applications by USCIS a priority of your office.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 1:27 PM
I hope this country is really serious about solving the problem of legal high skilled immigration.Legal immigration has a severe backlog. Think about the high skilled immigrants with Masters & PHDs from top universities who have to wait for 5-10 years to get their green cards. There will be no surprise that next google, IBM or Intel is indian or chinese company.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 2:14 PM
"Fulfilling our mission also means securing our borders . . ." and "When it comes to immigration, we need to facilitate legal immigration while we crack down on those who violate our nation’s laws . . ."
If the Secretary is committed to these concepts, why did she hire a lawyer who is using taxpayer dollars to work toward amnesty for illegal aliens? Make no mistake. EVERY illegal alien is a criminal, by definition. No one who is here illegally should be allowed to become a citizen unless he is some kind of political refugee such as a valuable defecting scientist or spy. The only exceptions should be introduced as individual bills in Congress.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 2:15 PM
Again ... with all due respect, DHS indeed has a long way to go in trying to incorporate all the 22 agencies into one. We have various organizations, duplicating contracts all trying to head in the same direction. How does an individual program manager stop the excess waste they see spreading around them? How does an individual program manager stop the incessant reliance on contracts for something that should be inherently owned by the government? How can we state that it is within the government's best interest to put a contractor in charge of assigning other contractors? Didn't we learn anything from the major SNAFU of the US Coast Guard's Deepwater Project? Saying everything is going along greatly does NOT make it so. Only listening to the answers you want to hear does not make everything right. ALSO ... we are NOT allowed to access certain sites yet you expect us to have some sort of way to comment as anything other than anonymous. I would GLADLY like to receive a response.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 2:34 PM
The changes that we need will be slow in coming and many mistakes will be made, but this is a huge step in the right direction - creating a blog and hearing from the people.
I work at our US Coast Guard Headquarters office and hope that some day the higher-ups will realize just how many silos there are when you have rank and power. We need to implement a program that allows "middle managers" to embrace change and be rewarded when they do and have consequences when don't. Sadly I don't see that here - at least not at my level. I see a lot of frustrated people and motivations being crushed when people try to question the status quo. We have a lot of really intelligent people here.
Here's a solution. Make every government organization create their own team of "change agents" selected as a diverse group to go through the organization to find problems by talking to the people. Post their results on the main web page so managers can see the problems with their own eyes. Then tackle them one by one. Managers and Leaders need to be held accountable for the failing of their departments.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 2:43 PM
Honorable Secretary
Thank you for focusing on legal immigration. It is great to have a "voice for the voiceless". Thousands of people who play by the rules are so often ignored because they have not dared to be "illegal" in America, but would rather start off playing by "rule of law"
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 3:13 PM
As United States citizens are losing jobs, the focus should NOT be on facilitating cheap foreign labor. It is the obligation and duty of this country to strictly enforce our immigration laws to ensure our citizens have opportunity to obtain jobs and education. Foreign countries must wait as we get our priorities taken care of and slow down the floodgate of aliens that endanger our precious freedoms everyday. My parents patiently waited 6 years to enter this country. I thank God they did.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 3:16 PM
Dear Secretary Napolitano,
DHS is doing a awesome job protecting the US and its citizens, and with intentions to improve each day, great job! However, I really think DHS needs to tour neighborhoods and reiterate to communities the importances of there participation in protecting their country and communities. Really getting people who care involved. Thank you
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 3:26 PM
The Interagency Operations Center for Maritime Security program initiated under the SAFE Port Act of 2006 accomplishes many of these goals - advancing preparedness, improving response, increased cooperation among Department components. This has been proven true in several pilots. Yet OMB zero'd out the FY 2010 request to continue the IOC development.
Perhaps a continuing push at the Department level reinforcing the component level push would help in allowing IOCs to meet your goals.
r/
Ted White
USCG (CG-741)
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 4:37 PM
I wish I could have as much faith in the system as I once did. The establishment of DHS is my opinion has not improved things, only lessened the effectiveness of once proud and effective government agencies. Management from my prospective has become worse with more micromanagement. Training through online VLC is a joke at my work place. We gather more and more insignificant statistics and are less effective. Management has such a negative outlook that many officers can't wait to leave. I don't beleive it will get better in the near future and the "One border, one hat" concept was a mistake. Will management ever admit it? No!
By
Paul N. Jones, At
June 8, 2009 9:22 PM
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has become the joke of the Department of Homeland Security. TSA has a low morale, low reputation, and the lowest respect compared to the rest of the agencies. TSA was supposed to be the last line of defense against terrorism in regards to domestic and international air travel. However, the lack of leadership, which starts up from the Federal Security Directors down to the Managers and Supervisors, has prevented TSA the growth, respectability and accountability levels that, otherwise, would give the agency the importance and recognition it truly deserves.
TSA would significantly benefit from the unification of all the department agencies because it will grow and develop a culture of responsibility and commitment that it currently does not have.
By
Anonymous, At
June 8, 2009 11:11 PM
Dear Secretary Napolitano:
I would like to congratulate you on what you have done thus far. However, USCIS needs to be streamlined. Management needs to be reviewed and I think you would find out what's really going on in the Districts around the nation if you allow employees to send you comments to a special mailbox. There is a lot of corruption in hiring, personnel practices, etc.
By
Anonymous, At
June 9, 2009 8:06 AM
Dear Secretary Napolitano:
I am a 30 year veteran of FEMA, I started as a Local Hire when it was called HUD, FDAA, FEMA now DHS "YES" through 3 name changes and a DAE now for 29 years. I have worked and trained over 3000 personnel from Locals to upper management. I would like to know why is it, when you do your recognition and appreciation ceremonies for the Permananent full time employees there is no mention of the DAE's especially when they too have given the majority of their lives for this agency with no retirement, no medical no benefits. I give my best to this agency because I love what I do. Most of the time trying to deal with the unfairness of the management staff with it being so obvious the buddy system, I want to quit, but if I do that I cannot help someone in need. I still have great respect for the agency as a whole, and I will continue to be here and do my duty until I can no longer perform my duties. I wish that I could have had a retirement pension. I did apply for many permanent positions that I know I qualified for but again it was the buddy system that kept me out.
Thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion and the best to you.
Concerned employee
By
Anonymous, At
June 9, 2009 8:51 AM
It remains to be seen how legal migration is a focus of the Napolitano led DHS, judging by the performance of the USCIS. Where spouses and immediate family of US citizens have to wait indefinitely for work authorization and adjustment of status, the temptation to take up unauthorized work or criminal acts is real. If the policy of the DHS is to discourage legal migration altogether, please publicize it, so that we can stay in our countries.
By
Anonymous, At
June 9, 2009 5:26 PM
Dear Secretary Napolitano,
I agree with the Priorities you've established and I agree that the top two are more important than the third. DTO's and external terrorist organizations are well funded and sophisticated, and the chaos in Mexico increases the opportunities for these organizations to infiltrate our borders by legal or illegal means. Unfortunately for many of the poor, the prospect of getting caught by US authorities is still less worse than having to live in the impoverished, violent chaos they regrettably live in now. If we achieve Priorities 3-5 at 100%, but failed at either Priority 1 or 2, then we fail. Your top two priorities are the right top two.
By
Anonymous, At
June 10, 2009 4:38 PM
In order to determine what is out of control, it's important to distinguish the work being done at the Service Centers from the Field Offices to determine if laws are being followed correctly at all sites, and where the problems are. My experience at a Field Office is that there's a quota system for case completions that is tied to performance. This leads to newer cases without legal issues being completed quickly, while cases with legal issues are set aside for months and possibly years. It's likely that a statistical analysis would show that the quota system leads to human error and therefore poses a national security risk, in addition to causing inconsistent customer service.
By
Anonymous, At
June 10, 2009 4:57 PM
Regarding the use of prevention to protecting our critical infrastructure, it is widely known that hundreds of chemical plants have converted to safer technologies since 9/11. Opponents of "The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009” (H.R. 2868), however, sometimes claim that this legislation would "dictate" government preferred technologies on businesses. As you know, H.R. 2868 actually allows each chemical facility to choose the best suited safer technology for their plant. It also does NOT require implementation of such technologies if they are infeasible, would shift risks or would impair a business’s ability to operate. Funding is also available to defray the costs of implementing safer technologies.
Could you comment on these conditions for implementing safer technologies contained in H.R. 2868?
Below is is more background for our readers:
On March 30, 2006 on the Senate floor as he co-sponsored S. 2486, Senator Barack Obama said, "…there are other ways to reduce risk that need to be part of the equation. Specifically, by employing safer technologies, we can reduce the attractiveness of chemical plants as a target.
“Unfortunately, the chemical industry has been lobbying nonstop on this bill. They do not want IST, they do not want protection of state laws and they do not want strict regulations…This is wrong. We cannot allow chemical industry lobbyists to dictate the terms of this debate. We cannot allow our security to be hijacked by corporate interests."
In February 2008, the Association of American Railroads said, “It’s time for the big chemical companies to do their part to help protect America. They should stop manufacturing dangerous chemicals when safer substitutes are available. And if they won’t do it, Congress should do it for them.”
A January 2006 GAO report (GAO-06-150) concluded, “Implementing inherently safer technologies potentially could lessen the consequences of a terrorist attack by reducing the chemical risks present at facilities, thereby making facilities less attractive targets.”
Sec. 550 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act which authorized the DHS’s regulations known as CFATS says, “the Secretary may not disapprove or approve a site security plan…based on the presence or absence of a particular security measure…” --- This language bars the DHS from requiring the use of safer chemicals or processes that can eliminate the consequences of a terrorist attack and render the plant undesirable as a target in the first place.
Since 9/11 hundreds of facilities have implemented these processes, thereby eliminating these risks to millions of Americans. The most well known example is the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant here in Washington, D.C. which converted from chlorine gas to relatively harmless liquid bleach 90 days after the 9/11 attacks. As a result, the plant no longer puts 1.7 million people in the D.C. area at risk. For examples in 49 states go to: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/04/b681085_ct2556757.html
By
Rick, At
June 15, 2009 5:37 PM
Last night I had an opportunity to watch a program on PBS World channel about airport security. The program was produced in 2007 and I am wondering if the problems that existed back in 2007 still are an issue. One of the segments was at Phoenix Sky Harbor and talked about TSA not having 24 hour security at the checkpoints (stations were being "guarded" by a rent a cop). One of the other segments discussed red teams doing inspections at the Denver airport. This out of all the segments worries me the most. If an simulated situation is getting passed security....what kind of real items are going through the detectors? I hope you and the TSA are working to correct or improve on this issue. And BTW... we miss you in AZ.
By
Anonymous, At
June 15, 2009 7:27 PM
I totally agree that u.s needs a better plan to help with illegal immigration but it is sad that the plight of legal immigration has been completely forgotten. Non immigrants from india and china who come here to study either Master's or Phd who are highly skilled and contribute to the economy are being left in the limbo for decades for a green card and brain drain had started... These skilled non immigrants have been on the so called h-1b for years and still without a green card. I hope and pray god shows the light to the goverment to act "fair" on the non immigrants who are waiting endlessly for green cards. these are the people who are in the u.s legally, who have paid taxes, who have respected the law and who are contributing to the economy...
By
Vijay, At
June 20, 2009 1:58 AM
As a professional immigrant working on H1B for 6 years, USCIS has bee nnothing but irresponsible. There is no light for us indians as far as green card processing fgoes based on today's priority dates. How can i invest in US when i am on visa.
By
Professional indian, At
June 23, 2009 7:11 PM
I am a legal immigrant, married to a US citizen. And to tell you the truth, the way you work sucks! I have paid all the dues and have always been an obedient person, yet it's been more than 3 years and you still haven't taken the time to thoroughly process my application and adjust my status. Shame on you!
By
Anonymous, At
June 29, 2009 8:32 PM
As a National Guardsman, I have a serious concern with FEMA's proposed contingency plan in response to a pandemic such as H1N1.
As on most occasions, FEMA relies on the National Guard to react to and provide support any natural disaster. I am concerned that this same protocol will be followed in a pandemic outbreak.
This protocol makes two fatal assumptions: First, it assumes that National Guardsmen themselves will be healthy and not affected by the outbreak. As we have experienced, the H1N1 virus is different than most inasmuch as it attacks those least susceptible to most viruses...the young, healthy population. If this pattern holds true, most of the National Guard's young enlisted Soldiers through it's mid-grade officers will be sick themselves. Not only will they be able to not assist in local law enforcement and quarantine operations, drawing them together will only compound the problem.
Second, it assumes that a Guardsman's family will remain healthy during the H1N1 (or other) outbreak or pandemic. I think I speak for a better part of the National Guard population, that if I am healthy, I am going to ensure my family is healthy and taken care of prior to embarking on any federal or state call up of the National Guard. If that means taking my family to a remote location somewhere, so be it.
The National Guard has never failed to answer the call when their state or nation needs them most. However, in the case of the H1N1 virus, FEMA, as well as the governors of various states must consider other options as their primary vehicle of support.
Respectfully,
Jason
By
Anonymous, At
June 30, 2009 7:46 AM
"criminal illegal aliens"??? As opposed to legal illegal aliens? Is this significant or just a typo or a slip of the pen? My concern is that illegal aliens (non-Americans illegally in this country) have more benefits and support and sympathy from the government than the hundreds of thousands of homeless Americans...many of whom are former military.
Grandpa Greer, Magnolia, KY
By
Jeff, At
July 1, 2009 2:46 PM
The DHS is wasting TIME and wasting our MONEY.
Why are you intentionally delaying the E-Verify Program?!
There is no justification for your continuous delay of the federal E-Verify Program; doing so, as you have, has keep millions of American citizens out of the JOBS they could otherwise have!
E-Verify are needed to make sure that illegal aliens do not steal what little jobs there are available inside this country.
Over 14 million American Citizens are out of work!
Meanwhile (thanks to your failures) over 8 Million illegal aliens hold our jobs!
DO NOT WAIT UNTIL SEPTEMBER! START USING IT NOW!
That is not right! You should be ashamed. You are not doing your job.
By
Anonymous, At
July 9, 2009 3:31 PM
You have delayed the E-Verify Program 3 to 4 times already! Wake up! Citizens do not have jobs!
Start the federal E-Verify program NOW! NOW! NOW!
Stop handing over good jobs to illegal aliens.
By
Anonymous, At
July 9, 2009 3:34 PM
Post a Comment
Thank you for leaving a comment at the Department of Homeland Security Leadership Journal. Comments submitted to the Department of Homeland Security Leadership Journal will be reviewed before posting.
Create a Link
<< Home