New Measures for Aviation Security and Information Sharing
Yesterday, I joined White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Assistant to the President for Counterterrorism and Homeland Security John Brennan to announce recommendations that DHS has made to the President for improving the technology and procedures used to protect air travel from acts of terrorism.The attempted attack on Northwest Flight 253 is a powerful illustration that terrorists will go to great lengths to try to defeat the security measures that have been put in place since Sept. 11, 2001. The steps I outlined yesterday will strengthen aviation security—at home and abroad—through new partnerships, technology and law enforcement efforts.
These steps include
- Re-evaluating and modifying the criteria and process used to create terrorist watch lists—including adjusting the process by which names are added to the “No-Fly” and “Selectee” lists.
- Establishing a partnership on aviation security between DHS and the Department of Energy and its National Laboratories in order to develop new and more effective technologies to deter and disrupt known threats and protect against new ways by which terrorists could seek to board an aircraft.
- Accelerating deployment of advanced imaging technology to provide greater explosives detection capabilities—and encourage foreign aviation security authorities to do the same—in order to identify materials such as those used in the attempted Dec. 25 attack. The Transportation Security Administration currently has 40 machines deployed throughout the United States, and plans to deploy 300 additional units in 2010.
- Strengthening the presence and capacity of aviation law enforcement—by deploying law enforcement officers from across DHS to serve as Federal Air Marshals to increase security aboard U.S.-bound flights.
- Working with international partners to strengthen international security measures and standards for aviation security.
Later this month, I will travel to Spain for the first of a series of global meetings with my international counterparts intended to bring about broad consensus on new international aviation security standards and procedures.
These steps come in addition to the Department’s immediate actions following the attempted attack on Dec. 25, 2009—including enhanced security measures at domestic airports and new international security directives that mandate enhanced screening of every individual flying into the United States from or through nations that are State Sponsors of Terrorism or other countries of interest and threat-based, random enhanced screening for all other passengers traveling on U.S.-bound flights.
I want to thank the Department of Homeland Security personnel who have been working day-in and day-out to implement these security measures since Christmas—as well as the traveling public for their continued patience. The public remains one of our most valuable layers of defense against acts of terrorism.
Janet Napolitano
Labels: aviation security, partnerships, science and technology, terrorism prevention, travel security, TSA

25 Comments:
Why aren't you meeting with the personnel from Amsterdam? Discontinue ANY visas from any middle eastern or african country until they can prove they are not a threat to this country.
By
Anonymous, At
January 9, 2010 1:54 AM
While these steps are in the right direction to prevent future threats, DHS is missing one other important aspect.The Green card applicants from the "14 countries of interest" listed by the TSA are getting in easily compared to other countries because of the "quota per country" system for the allocation of Green card visas. The individuals from these countries should be thoroughly vetted before their applications are even accepted for processing. They should also be put in the "slow queue" once in the system so that sufficient security investigations could be done before they can be granted Green cards and eventual Citizenship. The Visas that are unutilized for the year for these "countries of interest", while the investigation is going on, could be allocated to the individuals from "friendly" countries who have been waiting patiently for several years because of backlogs due to this quota system. This will prevent any "rogue" elements from these "countries of interest" entering and doing acts detrimental to the country and its citizens.
By
Anonymous, At
January 10, 2010 1:41 PM
I think one of the things the Department needs to look at is why CBP Officers from Customs and Border Protection are spending countless hours doing work outside of the Ports of Entry, when clearly they are needed at the Airports and Seaports. Time and time again we see that there is a threat in the airport environment but, in Miami for example, they expend and enormous amount of overtime dollars to cover the airports because they are shorthanded. Yet, they have a large number of Officers playing Border Patrol Agents and ICE Investigators outside of the air and sea Ports getting into every task force they can find, and going to marinas and running checks on every single person from an 8 year old to an 80 year old, instead of targeting and using their resources more effectively. Sure they can run the names of 1,000 citizens that step foot on a marina in the Miami area but, how many of those actually turn up as a target of interest? And how many of those do the Officers actually take any enforcement action against, besides issuing them a warning letter and placing them on a database to show how many names they ran???
By
Anonymous, At
January 12, 2010 8:45 AM
As far as things like information sharing and privacy, of course everyone has heard of the phone taps and the chat room spying. But right now I am wondering what if I use something like http://msafi.com/software-reviews/php-chat-website-script-and-software/ in order to create a chat website (or add chat rooms to existing website), will my site be in danger of getting monitored?
By
Cameron, At
January 13, 2010 1:20 AM
Decimating the rank and file to beef up the Fed. Air Marshall program will accomplish nothing. How will a plane full of FAM's stop someone from pushing a button to detonate an explosive? The terrorists need to be stopped BEFORE they get on the plane.
By
Anonymous, At
January 14, 2010 9:19 AM
I hope the steps you are planning on implementing work. As an American citizen I want to again feel safe to travel on our airlines. I shouldn't have to worry whether or not their is a terrorist on board.
By
Declutter Home, At
January 17, 2010 10:21 AM
"The Green card applicants from the "14 countries of interest" listed by the TSA are getting in easily compared to other countries because of the "quota per country" system for the allocation of Green card visas."
Actually, the quota is not per country. There is a queue for China, India, Mexico, the Philippines, and everywhere else. I don't, however, know how the green card lottery fits in to the picture.
By
Kayla Fay, At
January 20, 2010 11:58 PM
We can never be 100% secure from attacks, but the men and women who stand guard can't be thanked enough!!
By
Classic Shaving, At
January 21, 2010 5:39 AM
Spirituality has an important role in promoting peace amongst people of various political systems and religions.
Instead of aggression, choose peace; this would assist most profoundly all efforts to secure lives of Americans and citizens of the world at large.
Yes, spirituality has a practical role to play in 21st century!
By
Spiritual Blog, At
January 26, 2010 1:44 AM
I applaud the DHS for increasing the number of individuals on the No Fly List, and increasing security on international flights. I guess we can thank heaven that this failed attempt allowed the Department to step up efforts without the loss of life.
By
Utah Botox, At
January 26, 2010 11:26 PM
No country can be 100% safe. What we can do is to take the correct preventive measures to prevent our countries from these attacks.
By
John, At
February 3, 2010 11:40 AM
I can understand 100% security is not possible but more steps needs to be taken for better security..
By
Resume Guru, At
February 3, 2010 11:43 AM
It's funny that this was the EXACT attack by the shoe bomber except the explosive moved up from the feet to the mid section area. So let's break this down. The suspect had no jacket and heading to Detroit where the temp is below zero. No luggage and has a one way ticket.
Seriously, you don't need to develop a system to see that there's something wrong there.
By
hand sanitizer dispensers, At
February 4, 2010 12:21 AM
Im very concerned about this issue.This guy was on a watch list! His own father warned authorities about him.UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES should he have made it on any plane.
You make some very good points about stopping problems like this.I think every flight should have at least 2 federal agents onboard.
The thing is alot fo these flights are coming from other countries,in the US all measures will certainly be taken care off.But how can we be sure that other countries will be taking the same measures?Maybe a special check list of some kind for flights heading into America
Sorry if im ranting.
By
Cell Phone Lover, At
February 4, 2010 2:27 AM
I hope the increased security measures are effective. Unfortunatly, people are unwilling to be inconvienced by tightened restrictions. They want the benefits without the cost.
By
Kevin, At
February 5, 2010 10:34 AM
I must say that most things associated with the effort to thwart terrorism can be done through meaningful collaboration between various agencies of the world. Otherwise, we would be stuck in the stone age trying to detect and counter terrorism. I feel that the move to strengthen international efforts are a great step forward, but it needs to be followed by implementation of safety protocols that deal with flier safety.
By
Criminal Justice Degrees, At
February 6, 2010 4:35 AM
The intelligence community, including the Department of Homeland Security, needs to make sure that those who need access have these credentials. They need to implement access control that uses them. They need to certify their information technology infrastructure supports PIV and federated access.
By
Extreme Brite White, At
February 8, 2010 10:22 PM
We live in a democracy and we have to play by the rules. The terrorists do not and that's why we need these enhanced security measures that so many complain about, even though they are saving lives.
By
mark, At
February 9, 2010 5:17 AM
Great steps forward to decrease terror in our country. More needs to be done about it.
By
Sell Your Mobile, At
February 9, 2010 8:26 AM
It's clear at this point that more needs to be done. The more proactive we are the better. And the less time we spend announcing what we have done might help as well. No reason to give the bad guys any info at all.
By
AMH in Florida, At
February 9, 2010 5:30 PM
We need some kind of international information-sharing system to identify anyone at airports who is suspected to have terrorist ties. It's great though that steps are being taken against terrorism.
By
Effective Internet Marketing, At
February 20, 2010 7:37 PM
We can never be 100% secure from attacks, but the men and women who stand guard can't be thanked enough!!
By
Cover Song, At
March 8, 2010 10:14 PM
Everyone understands that there must be security for the innocent folks. The only thing is, how long will extra measures take? Will planes be delayed? Will people get irate? There must be a way to get security for all, but in a timely fashion. There should be a machine that can detect things accurately. Just like the medal detectors.
By
My Computer Is Slow, At
March 13, 2010 5:55 AM
there is more to do about this situation. I just wonder why they want to to that. It seam there is no 100% secure place any more.
By
CB Predator, At
March 14, 2010 9:53 AM
Before 9/11: You had a bunch of lazy and ineffective people screening you, looking for weapons and what not. They were employed by the airport.
After 9/11: Those lazy and ineffective people are employed by the US government instead of the airport.
By
fat lower, At
March 16, 2010 4:04 AM
Post a Comment
Create a Link
<< Home